2014
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel genotype–phenotype associations demonstrated by high-throughput sequencing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Abstract: ObjectiveA predictable relation between genotype and disease expression is needed in order to use genetic testing for clinical decision-making in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The primary aims of this study were to examine the phenotypes associated with sarcomere protein (SP) gene mutations and test the hypothesis that variation in non-sarcomere genes modifies the phenotype.MethodsUnrelated and consecutive patients were clinically evaluated and prospectively followed in a specialist clinic. High-throughpu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
105
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
105
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with a growing body of evidence that supports a lower risk profile among genotype-negative HCM, with lower rates of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure-related mortality, and SCD/aborted SCD compared with genotype-positive HCM. 14,[16][17][18] These data collectively support the concept that genotype-negative, nonfamilial HCM represents a clinically distinct disease process, perhaps elicited by a combination of multiple genetic variants of low effect size, lifestyle factors (eg, hypertension), and age, rather than being caused by single autosomal-dominant mutations with strong independent effects. This concept is supported by a recent study where HCM was diagnosed in only 3% of first-degree relatives of HCM probands in the absence of a sarcomere gene mutation or family history of HCM, with none of these individuals reporting adverse events.…”
Section: See Article By Van Velzen Et Alsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with a growing body of evidence that supports a lower risk profile among genotype-negative HCM, with lower rates of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure-related mortality, and SCD/aborted SCD compared with genotype-positive HCM. 14,[16][17][18] These data collectively support the concept that genotype-negative, nonfamilial HCM represents a clinically distinct disease process, perhaps elicited by a combination of multiple genetic variants of low effect size, lifestyle factors (eg, hypertension), and age, rather than being caused by single autosomal-dominant mutations with strong independent effects. This concept is supported by a recent study where HCM was diagnosed in only 3% of first-degree relatives of HCM probands in the absence of a sarcomere gene mutation or family history of HCM, with none of these individuals reporting adverse events.…”
Section: See Article By Van Velzen Et Alsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In fact, FG+ probands had higher all-cause mortality compared with nonfounder G+ probands (29% versus 15%; P<0.05 in Table 3), although with Kaplan-Meier analysis, this comparison did not reach statistical significance (P=0.14). The progression to systolic dysfunction (defined as ejection fraction <55%) in the FG+ probands and nonfounder G+ probands was high compared with previously published cohorts 14,15 but similar between groups (46% for each). One potential reason for this may be a higher cutoff for low ejection fraction (most prior studies use 50%), although arguably 55% is probably more appropriate given the typical hyperdynamic HCM phenotype.…”
Section: See Article By Van Velzen Et Alsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The Heart Hospital population comprised a cohort of unrelated consecutive patients with idiopathic or sarcomeric HCM who were tested for sarcomeric protein gene mutations using high-throughput sequencing between 2011 and 201315 and all patients diagnosed with one of the following conditions between 1991 and 2014: Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD); primary mitochondrial disease; immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL); hereditary transthyretin type amyloidosis; wild-type or senile systemic amyloidosis (SSA); Noonan syndrome; Lentigines, Electrocardiographic abnormalities, Ocular hypertelorism, Pulmonary stenosis, Abnormalities of the genitalia, Retardation of growth, Deafness (LEOPARD) syndrome; carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (CPT II) deficiency; mutations in the four-and-a-half LIM domain protein 1 (FHL1) gene; Friedreich's ataxia and glycogen storage disease (GSD) including Danon disease and AMP-protein kinase deficiency caused by mutations in PRKAG2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it should be underlined that the sensitivity and specificity of the VE/VCO 2 slope cut-off point derived in the same data where it is being tested in will naturally have superior performance compared with externally derived metrics. The lack of data on cardiac resonance imaging as well as the fact that a possible impact of different gene mutations has not been investigated represent obvious limitations 33 34. Furthermore, we acknowledge that our SCD risk analysis considered syncopal episodes occurred ≤5 years instead of <1 year 5.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%