2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-019-04738-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel features for intensive human activity recognition based on wearable and smartphone sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, an increased DR1 can result in a reduced cross-sectional area of the fiber sheath (A). Therefore, according to equation (2), for the fibers with the same lengths, it can be found that an increased DR1 leads to an increased resistance of the fiber. Figure 6(a,b) show the effects of the CB concentration in the sheath material and DR1 on the breaking tenacity and breaking strain of the fibers, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, an increased DR1 can result in a reduced cross-sectional area of the fiber sheath (A). Therefore, according to equation (2), for the fibers with the same lengths, it can be found that an increased DR1 leads to an increased resistance of the fiber. Figure 6(a,b) show the effects of the CB concentration in the sheath material and DR1 on the breaking tenacity and breaking strain of the fibers, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, real-time monitoring and data management of human physiological signals have been in urgent need, which has greatly stimulated the development of wearable technologies, especially wearable sensing technologies. [1][2][3] Fabric sensors are fabricated by embedding or integrating sensing materials into fabrics, [4][5][6] which are characterized by features including softness, flexibility, lightweight, permeability, and durability. These features give the fabric sensors the capability of being compliant to the wearer's body and offer next-to-the-skin wearability, as well as good reliability when the sensors are used for monitoring physiological signals of the human body.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieved accuracy for HAR tasks is 0.95. Similarly, the authors propose a stacked ensemble model for human activity recognition in [20]. A neural network is used as a meta learner while latent Dirichlet allocation, decision tree, Gaussian naive Bayes, k nearest neighbor, SVM, and multi-layered perceptron are used as the base learners for the proposed approach.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 11 contains the results and the models of the above-mentioned studies. [44] Deep CNN 0.946 [45] Deep CNN 0.951 [46] Deep CNN 0.947 [47] Deep CNN 0.900 [48] Deep ConvLSTM 0.958 [16] Residual Bi LSTM 0.905 [17] Multiview stacking 0.925 [18] Stacked LSTM 0.930 [19] SDAE+GBM 0.959 [20] Stacked ensemble 0.960 [21] Stacked ensemble 0.968 DS-MLP Deep Stacked Ensemble 0.973 Performance analysis suggests that the approaches based on deep CNN have an accuracy between 0.90 to 0.95. Ensemble approaches, on the other hand, tend to have higher accuracy than that of simple deep learning approaches.…”
Section: Performance Comparison With State-of-the-art Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, human activity recognition systems can be categorized into four classes: wearable-based [4], vision-based [5], ambient devices-based [6], and wirelessbased. Wearable sensor devices are widely used for human activity recognition especially in elder healthcare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%