2010
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel environment exploration and home range size in starlings Sturnus vulgaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
47
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, these responses changed in their detail with season, highlighting the ecological complexity of BT-dependent space use. In contrast to other examples [23,25,27,57,58], the space-use differences we observed among BTs did not result from confounding factors such as using a movement-based BT definition (e.g. activity or exploration), or from any difference among BTs in the habitat or niche they occupied, or from differences in their social context (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Yet, these responses changed in their detail with season, highlighting the ecological complexity of BT-dependent space use. In contrast to other examples [23,25,27,57,58], the space-use differences we observed among BTs did not result from confounding factors such as using a movement-based BT definition (e.g. activity or exploration), or from any difference among BTs in the habitat or niche they occupied, or from differences in their social context (e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the detection of personality-dependent spatial behaviors is relatively rare, our detection of personality-dependent HR, movement, dispersal, and site fidelity complements personalitydependent spatial ecology noted in other studies and for other taxa, including HR in feral cats Felis catus (Barratt 1997), and starlings Sturnus vulgaris (Minderman et al 2010), migratory movements and site fidelity in roach Rutilus rutilus (Chapman et al 2011;Brodersen et al 2012), and dispersal in invasive mosquitofish G. affinis (Cote et al 2010(Cote et al 2011. Furthermore, our repeatability values are similar to the average values (R = ~0.37) reported for most behaviors in a meta-analysis by Bell et al (2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Nonetheless in both fish and other animal populations, evidence of temporally consistent, cross-contextual patterns of personality-dependent dispersal is rare (Miriam et al 2013). Furthermore, only a few authors have investigated the role of personality in other important spatial ecology metrics including HR (Minderman et al 2010), movement (Fraser et al 2001;Chapman et al 2011;Brodersen et al 2012), and site fidelity (Brodersen et al 2012). Indeed, individual differences in movement behaviors are a typical feature of spatial ecology data sets, particularly in fishes (Conrad et al 2011;Taylor and Cooke 2012), which often feature "resident" and "mobile" contingent strategies (Skalski and Gilliam 2000;Fraser et al 2001;Morrissey and Ferguson 2011;Radinger and Wolter 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported relationships between boldness and activity axes (Boyer et al 2010;Lantová et al 2011;Dammhahn 2012;Herde and Eccard 2013), while others have demonstrated links between those traits and dispersal (Fraser et al 2001;Dingemanse et al 2003) or space use (Boon et al 2007;Minderman et al 2010). Although we did not relate tests to behavior of bears after release, we believe our study provides a framework for future rehabilitation and release programs interested in assessing individual behavior and correlates to post-release behavior and space use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%