Novel effects of high intensity auditory stimulation on the cardiac response

Eves, Frank F.; Gruzelier, J.

doi:10.1016/0301-0511(84)90064-4

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…HRA and HRD were scored as the fastest and slowest beats per minute, respectively, during the periods indicated above (e.g., Mothersill et al, 1986). Charting of response extremes ensured that the probability of registering both phases of cardiac activity (e.g., Eves & Gruzelier, 1984;Obrist, 1981) would be maximized (Galambos, 1978;Gumbel, 1958). Phasic fluctuations in these components previously have been demonstrated in situations of threat (e.g., Deane, 1969;Dronsejko, 1972).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As well, it has been indicative of anticipatory information processing demands (Dobson & Neufeld, 1981), along with covert information processing (Obrist, 1981). HRD has been associated with visual intake of external stimulation (Blaylock, 1972; Eves & Gruzelier, 1984; Lacey, 1972; D. B. D. Smith & Strawbridge, 1969) as well as with low physical movement (Obrist, 1981).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Decision-theoretic aspects of stress arousal and coping propensity.

Lees¹,

Neufeld²

1999

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scenario descriptor and laboratory studies evaluated a decision-theoretic model of stress arousal and coping propensity composed of 2 stress expectancies; namely, expected stress given engagement in coping activity and expected stress given nonengagement in coping activity. The model predicted (a) that coping propensity would vary inversely with the ratio of the first stress expectancy to the second and (b) that stress arousal would vary with the lesser of the 2 stress expectancies. It was also predicted that the smallest stress expectancy would dictate coping activity and that the proximity of the stress expectancies would engender stressing response conflict. Results supported the first hypothesis when differences in ratio values were salient. The second hypothesis also was supported, but in the scenario descriptor study only. Proximity of stress expectancies as sources of stress arousal received little or no support.

show abstract