2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2882189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Effective Connectivity Inference Using Ultra-Group Constrained Orthogonal Forward Regression and Elastic Multilayer Perceptron Classifier for MCI Identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this experiment, we use FedResNet, centralized ResNet (He et al 2016 ), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) (Tajbakhsh et al 2016 ), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) (Li et al 2018 ), K Nearest Neighbors (KNN) (Park and Lee 2018 ), and Support Vector Machines (SVM) (Morra et al 2009 ) as our baseline models that proves FedDPGAN performance. Note that we apply ResNet model in our FedDPGAN framework.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this experiment, we use FedResNet, centralized ResNet (He et al 2016 ), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) (Tajbakhsh et al 2016 ), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) (Li et al 2018 ), K Nearest Neighbors (KNN) (Park and Lee 2018 ), and Support Vector Machines (SVM) (Morra et al 2009 ) as our baseline models that proves FedDPGAN performance. Note that we apply ResNet model in our FedDPGAN framework.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such a group constrained sparse network can simultaneously make a common region of interest (ROI) selection across subjects and optimally estimate the ROI time series under consideration. Li et al (Li et al, 2018) used a new sparse constrained connectivity inference method and an elastic multilayer perceptron classifier (MPC) to identify MCI. The topology of the network connection is effectively identified by considering the weak derivative information of the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, performance was satisfactory when discriminating between AD and controls (accuracies between 85-97%), but dropped when discriminating between MCI and controls (70-88%). Most studies reported the nodes which contribute most to discrimination between AD and controls: there is some heterogeneity, but most often components of the default mode network (DMN) were identified (Yang Li et al 2019;Nguyen et al 2019;Jin et al 2020;M. Wang et al 2020).…”
Section: Functional Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%