2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-03011-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Common Femoral Artery Lesion Classification in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our evaluation, there was no significant difference regarding TLR between the different lesion groups according to Rabellinio et al [ 11 ]; in particular, bifurcation lesions did not result in inferior outcomes as compared to lesions limited to the CFA main stem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our evaluation, there was no significant difference regarding TLR between the different lesion groups according to Rabellinio et al [ 11 ]; in particular, bifurcation lesions did not result in inferior outcomes as compared to lesions limited to the CFA main stem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Applying the Rabellino classification [ 11 ], there was no difference regarding TLR after subdivision into group I/II and the groups with bifurcation involvement (III/IV) as shown in Figure 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, Rabellino et al modified the Azema classification in a very practical way [4]: Previous Type IV lesions defined as bypass stenotic lesions were excluded in order to limit the new classification to native artery atherosclerotic lesions. Hence, Type I-III lesions remained the same.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%