2014
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-13-0667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel ATP-Competitive MEK Inhibitor E6201 Is Effective against Vemurafenib-Resistant Melanoma Harboring the MEK1-C121S Mutation in a Preclinical Model

Abstract: Many clinical cases of acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib have recently been reported. One of the causes of this acquired resistance is the BRAF downstream kinase point mutation MEK1-C121S. This mutation confers resistance to not only vemurafenib, but also to the allosteric MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244). Here, we investigated the pharmacologic activities and effectiveness of the novel MEK inhibitor E6201 against BRAF (v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1)-V600E mutant melanom… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we found that the MEK mutations we studied provided additional resistance to both MEK and ERK inhibitors in a manner clearly related to their ability to activate ERK since the effect was more pronounced for ERK inhibition than it was for MEK inhibition. This dichotomy suggests that some MEK mutants are not, as has been widely reported (11,30,39) providing direct resistance to the MEK inhibitor; instead, it is the increased level of ERK activation they provide that requires additional inhibition. The increased resistance to ERK inhibition by MEK mutants we report is highly novel and has not been previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly, we found that the MEK mutations we studied provided additional resistance to both MEK and ERK inhibitors in a manner clearly related to their ability to activate ERK since the effect was more pronounced for ERK inhibition than it was for MEK inhibition. This dichotomy suggests that some MEK mutants are not, as has been widely reported (11,30,39) providing direct resistance to the MEK inhibitor; instead, it is the increased level of ERK activation they provide that requires additional inhibition. The increased resistance to ERK inhibition by MEK mutants we report is highly novel and has not been previously reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The rationale of these approaches is to prevent or overcome MAPK inhibitor dependent resistance mechanisms, although the appearance of systemic toxicities remains one of the main concerns when combining several small molecules (115)(116)(117)(118)(119). Other groups have attempted to tackle mechanisms of resistance related to the appearance of mutations in MEK1/2 and novel MEK inhibitors active in some of these mutants show interesting potential (120). An avenue of action expected to draw increasing attention is the use of ERK inhibitors (121)(122)(123).…”
Section: Potential For Alternative Combination Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E6201 shows identical affinity and residence time for the active and inactive forms of MEK1 (12), and demonstrates different pharmacologic activities than those of allosteric MEK inhibitors and exerts exclusive effects on targeting acquired MEK1-C121S mutation, which confers resistance to the allosteric MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) in melanoma (13). E6201 also has a long occupancy time for FLT3 (11-fold longer than that for MEK).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%