2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11094-016-1417-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Armed Pyrazolobenzothiazine Derivatives: Synthesis, X-Ray Crystal Structure and POM analyses of Biological Activity Against Drug Resistant Clinical Isolate of Staphylococcus aureus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To access the pharmacokinetic profile of the tested compounds, we employed Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration (POM) analyses. The results of theoretical toxicity risks of compounds 1a-1f, which are calculated with the aid of the Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration (POM) program are shown in Table 3 [30][31][32]. Our findings reveal that all synthesized compounds 1a-1f, are not toxic and can be utilized as therapeutic agents.…”
Section: Pom Analyses Of Compounds (1a-1f)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…To access the pharmacokinetic profile of the tested compounds, we employed Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration (POM) analyses. The results of theoretical toxicity risks of compounds 1a-1f, which are calculated with the aid of the Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration (POM) program are shown in Table 3 [30][31][32]. Our findings reveal that all synthesized compounds 1a-1f, are not toxic and can be utilized as therapeutic agents.…”
Section: Pom Analyses Of Compounds (1a-1f)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Among the evaluated compounds, the derivatives 12a, 12c, 12g, 12i and 12k exhibited prominent inhibition of the yeast α-glucosidase enzyme [68,69] 5), which were less than the reference drug, acarbose (IC 50 = 58.8 µM [42,43]). Similarly, these derivatives were proven more effective α-glucosidase inhibitors in comparison to the reported benzimidazoles [70], dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazoles [71] and 2-thioxobenzo[g]quinazolines [72] but less potent than the sulfonamide chalcones [44].…”
Section: α-Glucosidase Inhibitionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the 1,2-benzothiazine-3-carbohydrazides 6 and 7 (Figure 1) were proven good α-glucosidase inhibitors, with IC 50 values of 3.9 and 4.2 µM, respectively [29,30]. Some other biological activities shown by 1,2-benzothiazine derivatives are MAO inhibitors [31], α-glucosidase inhibitors [32,33], anti-inflammatory agents [34], antiviral agents [35][36][37][38], anticancer agents [39,40], antitumor agents [41], cholinesterase inhibitors [42] and anti-microbial agents [43]. In addition, various sulfonamides were also found to be good inhibitors of α-glucosidase [44] and α-amylase [45] enzymes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…POM physicochemical analysis or ADME/T is important to qualify drugs and their efficacy as leading candidates against various biotargets, as like antibacterial (Grib et al, 2020;Hatzade et al, 2015;Jamalis et al, 2020;Jarrahpour et al,2019;Mabkhot et al, 2015Mabkhot et al, , 2016Messali et al, 2014Messali et al, , 2015Nasruddin et al, 2018;Rad et al, 2017;Rbaa et al, 2019;Sajid et al, 2016;Tatar et al, 2016), antifungal (Al-Maqtari et al, 2017Khan et al, 2017;Rachedi et al, 2020;Radi et al, 2015;Tighadouni et al, 2016;Titi et al, 2019), antiviral (Chander et al, 2017;Lahsasni et al, 2015), antitumoral (Bechlem et al, 2020;Kamal et al, 2019;Piaz et al, 2018;Rachedi et al, 2019Rachedi et al, , 2020Youssoufi et al, 2015), antiparasitic drugs and various enzymes inhibitors (Amirkhanov et al, 2019;Ben Hadda et al, 2018Mabkhot et al, 2014;Rauf et al, 2017). The POM physicochemical calculations included a partition coefficient (cLogP), aqueous solubility, donor hydrogen bond, and drug-likeness, evaluated in terms of Lipinski's ruleof-five.…”
Section: Pom Analyses and Identification Of Pharmacophore Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%