2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2011.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel approaches to waxy crude restart: Part 2: An investigation of flow events following shut down

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current section, gelation was determined by using oscillatory tests as proposed by others (Webber 2001;Venkatesan et al 2003;Coutinho 2004, 2007;Kané et al 2004;Visintin et al 2005;Magda et al 2009;Tinsley et al 2009;Phillips et al 2011). Low-amplitude and low-frequency oscillating shear strain was applied to the oil specimen within the linear viscoelastic region.…”
Section: Gelation Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current section, gelation was determined by using oscillatory tests as proposed by others (Webber 2001;Venkatesan et al 2003;Coutinho 2004, 2007;Kané et al 2004;Visintin et al 2005;Magda et al 2009;Tinsley et al 2009;Phillips et al 2011). Low-amplitude and low-frequency oscillating shear strain was applied to the oil specimen within the linear viscoelastic region.…”
Section: Gelation Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystals start forming and the rheological behavior of the crude oil turns from a simple Newtonian to a much more complex behavior and can now exhibit a high yield stress and time-dependent characteristics. Thus, the transport of waxy crude oils through long pipelines in cold environments involves handling some huge flow assurance issues, such as the management of wax deposition at the pipe walls or high pressure gradients needed for flow restart after stoppage, with the possibility of additional issues, e.g., appearance of void fractions during cool down at rest [H enaut et al (1999); Philips et al (2011a)] and pressure propagation effects [Philips et al (2011b); El-gendy (2012)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the pipeline restart process, the formed gel needs to be broken. [5][6][7] Therefore, an accurate rheological model is necessary to simulate pipeline shut-in and restart processes. [8] Various rheological models exist for fluid behavior prediction, several which are based on Herschel-Bulkley [9] or cross formulations.…”
Section: Strain-dependent Rheological Model and Pressure Wave Predictmentioning
confidence: 99%