2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel approach to recycled carbon fiber suitability assessment for additive technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slower degradation kinetics of the cross-linked polymers compared to linear polymers can be attributed to the inefficient UV absorption by the UV-absorbing CFs. XPS measurements were conducted to study the surface properties of the recovered CFs and the pristine CFs (Figure b). The peak patterns and chemical bond percentages of the recovered CFs closely resembled those of the pristine CFs, indicating the successful recovery of the CFs without significant structural changes. Furthermore, SEM analysis was conducted to examine the microstructures of pristine CFs, CFRP composites, and recycled CFs (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The slower degradation kinetics of the cross-linked polymers compared to linear polymers can be attributed to the inefficient UV absorption by the UV-absorbing CFs. XPS measurements were conducted to study the surface properties of the recovered CFs and the pristine CFs (Figure b). The peak patterns and chemical bond percentages of the recovered CFs closely resembled those of the pristine CFs, indicating the successful recovery of the CFs without significant structural changes. Furthermore, SEM analysis was conducted to examine the microstructures of pristine CFs, CFRP composites, and recycled CFs (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[43][44][45][46] As shown in Figure 4a, the occurrence of hydrophilic functional groups of the LO-CFs, such as hydroxyl groups (─OH) (3570-3200 cm −1 ) and carboxyl groups ─C = O) (1700-1520 cm −1 ), shows the enhanced absorption capability, indicating that the LO-CFs have better hydrophilicity than the pristine CFs. [47,48] To further investigate the chemical composition differences between the CFs and LO-CFs, XPS spectra for them were also recorded (Figure 4b). The intensity of the O1s peak of LO-CFs is significantly stronger than that of the CFs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectra before and after regeneration exhibited three primary peaks, specifically C 1s at 285 eV, O 1s at 532 eV, and N 1s at 399 eV. The carbon fiber's surface before and after recovery is primarily composed of inert carbon atoms [26]. After the recovery process, there was a minor modification in the functional groups present on the surface of the carbon fiber.…”
Section: Properties Of Recovered Carbon Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile test results demonstrated that the elastic modulus of the composite dropped from an average of 11.32 GPa before the recovery process to an average of 8.58 GPa after the recovery process. The tensile strength of the recovered carbon fiber-reinforced resin matrix composites also decreased from 320.67 MPa to 268.06 MPa, leading to a decline in the tensile mechanical properties [26]. The carbon fiber-reinforced composite underwent a bending test.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Composite Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%