Novel approach to measure the size of plasma‐membrane nanodomains in single molecule localization microscopy

Abstract

Many membrane proteins are not evenly distributed over the plasma membrane, but gathered in domains assumed to have a particular lipid composition. Using single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) we have immunolocalized a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor protein that labels nanodomains in a specialized plant cell type, and compared the suitability of three methods to estimate their size. As conventional methods full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the full diameter (FWMin) of domains were used. A boundary detection method of the domain area (DA) was performed in order to take irregular shapes into account. In order to compare the influence of the chosen measurement methods, we have developed a MatLab program that allows for automated analysis of domain sizes from multiple SMLM images and provides the statistics of three key features of domains: FWHM and FWMin along their long and short axes as well as the DA, derived from the molecular density. Domains formed by the GPI-anchor protein are approximating elliptical shapes. Direct and indirect immunolabeling resulted in a statistically significant difference in apparent domain size, reflecting the fact that the secondary antibody molecules extend the uncertainty along the nanodomain border. FWMin values along the long and short axis give good estimates of regular, geometrically centred domain shapes, while the DA value matches regular as well as irregular shapes best, as derived from computer-generated, irregular point clusters. V C 2015 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry

Localization of the glucosinolate biosynthetic enzymes reveals distinct spatial patterns for the biosynthesis of indole and aliphatic glucosinolates

“…To further investigate which specific cell types in the phloem tissue contained the CYP83A1 and CYP83B1 fluorescent marker proteins, we immunostained stem sections with a sieve element‐specific antibody (Khan et al , Ziomkiewicz et al ). Simultaneous visualization of the fluorescently labeled enzymes relative to the position of the sieve elements enabled us to assign cell type specificity to the cells observed with CYP83A1‐ and CYP83B1‐tagged fluorescence in the phloem tissue (Fig.…”

“…For immunostaining, sections were instead transferred to a blocking solution (2.5% (w/v) low fat dry milk in PBS buffer (100 m M NaH 2 PO 4 /Na 2 HPO 4 ; 150 m M NaCl; pH 7.5)) and incubated for 10 min with occasional agitation. The sections were then transferred into the primary antibody solution (monoclonal antibody RS‐6 (Khan et al , Ziomkiewicz et al ), 1:800 in PBS) and incubated for 45 min, washed three times in PBS and transferred into the secondary antibody solution (Alexa Fluor ® 635 Goat Anti‐Mouse IgG (H + L), Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, 1:50 in PBS). After 30 min incubation, the sections were washed three times in PBS and transferred to glass slides for microscopic examinations.…”

Packing Density of the Amyloid Precursor Protein in the Cell Membrane

“…In addition, the average diameter of $75 nm is probably an overestimate, as we had to rely on sequential primary and/or secondary antibody labeling. On these spatial scales, the size of antibodies is no longer negligible and tends to increase the size of the labeled structure (62). Each of these uncertainties contributes to the underestimation of the packing density.…”

Plant immune and growth receptors share common signalling components but localise to distinct plasma membrane nanodomains

“…In plants, the cell wall has additional influence on the PM organisation and dynamics (Martinière et al, 2012). As a consequence, lateral mobility and distribution of lipids and proteins within the PM is highly heterogeneous leading to the formation of dynamic protein clusters and PM sub-compartments with different shapes and sizes (Jaqaman and Grinstein, 2012; Jarsch et al, 2014; Ziomkiewicz et al, 2015). Each compartment or domain provides specific biophysical and biochemical environments for its residents and thus directly influences associated signalling activities (Kusumi et al, 2012; Saka et al, 2014; Garcia-Parajo et al, 2014; Tapken and Murphy, 2015).…”