2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.103013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel approach to assess the impact of the Fano factor on the sensitivity of low-mass dark matter experiments

Abstract: As first suggested by U. Fano in the 1940s, the statistical fluctuation of the number of pairs produced in an ionizing interaction is known to be sub-Poissonian. The dispersion is reduced by the so-called "Fano factor," which empirically encapsulates the correlations in the process of ionization. In modeling the energy response of an ionization measurement device, the effect of the Fano factor is commonly folded into the overall energy resolution. While such an approximate treatment is appropriate when a signi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the treatment in Ref. [44], in which the Fano distribution is used to model charge yield down to the ionization threshold, we find that both eh and F are inadequate to accurately capture low-energy ionization yield. This is in large part due to the solid-state nature of Si; for processes close to the gap, where the phase space is restricted by the band-structure, we observe non-trivial departures from this simple two-parameter model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast to the treatment in Ref. [44], in which the Fano distribution is used to model charge yield down to the ionization threshold, we find that both eh and F are inadequate to accurately capture low-energy ionization yield. This is in large part due to the solid-state nature of Si; for processes close to the gap, where the phase space is restricted by the band-structure, we observe non-trivial departures from this simple two-parameter model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…where P com (N |µ(E d ), F (E d )) is derived from the COM-Poisson distribution [21,22], a discrete distribution function well-suited to model ionization statistics as it allows for an independent control -and hence fitting - of the mean value µ(E d ) = E d /W (E d ) and Fano factor F (E d ) [23]. The energy scale of the 37 Ar spectrum shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Understanding Of the Energy Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these are evidence of the excellent agreement between our model and the energy response of the detector. It is also worth emphasizing that this study allowed for an assessment of the COM-Poisson distribution as a model for primary ionization statistics [23].…”
Section: B Understanding Of the Energy Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for confirmation of the linearity of the detector energy response over this energy regime, and modelling of the detector response in energy and risetime (a PSD variable proportional to radii). To fit this data, the detector's energy response was modeled using the COM-Poisson distribution for primary ionization [18], and the Polya distribution for avalanche ionization [14]. Electronegative contaminants in the gas (such as O 2 and H 2 O) preferentially reduce the amplitude of events originating farther from the sensor (at higher risetimes), which is modeled using binomial statistics for the number of un-trapped primary electrons, with the survival probability varying linearly with risetime.…”
Section: Commissioning At the Lsmmentioning
confidence: 99%