2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13602-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel approach reveals genomic landscapes of single-strand DNA breaks with nucleotide resolution in human cells

Abstract: Single-strand breaks (SSBs) represent the major form of DNA damage, yet techniques to map these lesions genome-wide with nucleotide-level precision are limited. Here, we present a method, termed SSiNGLe, and demonstrate its utility to explore the distribution and dynamic changes in genome-wide SSBs in response to different biological and environmental stimuli. We validate SSiNGLe using two very distinct sequencing techniques and apply it to derive global profiles of SSBs in different biological states. Strikin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other method, SSiNGLe, is quite different from Nick-seq and is limited solely to mapping single-strand breaks with 3′-hydroxyl groups ( 36 ). Unfortunately, the method cannot be applied to any other form of DNA modification or damage and cannot be used for single-strand breaks with ‘dirty 3′-ends’ as occur in DNA repair intermediates (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other method, SSiNGLe, is quite different from Nick-seq and is limited solely to mapping single-strand breaks with 3′-hydroxyl groups ( 36 ). Unfortunately, the method cannot be applied to any other form of DNA modification or damage and cannot be used for single-strand breaks with ‘dirty 3′-ends’ as occur in DNA repair intermediates (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the DNA fragmentation with micrococcal nuclease relies on the presence of nucleosomes to limit the fragmentation to the ∼150 nt periodicity of nucleosome-bound DNA ( 40 ). Furthermore, the accuracy of SSiNGLe for single-nucleotide resolution is relatively low, with only 87–95% of the breaks mapping to ± 1 nt of the true cutting site of the single-strand endonuclease Nt.BbvCI used to validate the method ( 36 ), with no mention of the number of missed consensus sites. The combination of NT and TdT labelling in Nick-seq significantly increases the accuracy of the method, with 98% of the exact cutting sites accurately called.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, four NGS-based methods have been developed for the genome-wide mapping of SSBs: SSB-Seq [71,72], Nick-Seq [73], SSiNGLe [74] and GLOE-Seq [75] (Table 1). Although the molecular steps involved in generating sequencing libraries vary, they all rely on the common principle of detecting SSBs by capturing free 3 0 -OH termini.…”
Section: Ngs-based Methods For Genome-wide Mapping Of Ssbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct ligation of a sequencing adaptor to the 3’ end of individual DNA strands would be a very attractive means of quantifying DNA damage irrespective of DNA resection, and direct labelling of DNA 3’ ends may reveal replication fork direction, particularly in mutants unable to ligate Okazaki fragments. Some methods aimed at mapping single-strand breaks and base changes theoretically have this capability although they have not been applied to DSBs [34, 35], and very recently the Ulrich lab described such a method, GLOE-seq, that is capable of replication profiling in DNA ligase-deficient yeast and human cells, and also maps DSBs although activity on resected substrates was not tested [36]. Here we describe an alternative method, T ransferase A ctivated E nd L igation sequencing (TrAEL-seq), which accurately maps DNA 3’ ends at DSBs that have undergone DNA resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%