2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-022-02967-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel approach for soil classification using machine learning methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Models Used Accuracy Obtained Manh Duc Nguyen et al [5] SVC, MLP, RF SVC=98.4% Kumar et al [30] ANN 95% Choudhury et. al [31] SVM 91.37%, 95.72% Srunitha et al [32] SVM 95% Lu et al [33] CNN AUC=91.47% Lamesck et al [34] SVM-poly 94.3% Bhattacharya et al [35] Decision Trees, ANN and SVM 89.34%, 87% and 71.18% Zhao et al [36] ANN 88%, 81% Mengistu et al [37] Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) 89.7% Wu et al [38] Multi SVM with Polynomial Kernel 79.4% and 99.2% Guang et al [39] PLS-DA and Multi SVM with Polynomial Kernel 93.33% and 96.67% Vibhute et al [40] Multi…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models Used Accuracy Obtained Manh Duc Nguyen et al [5] SVC, MLP, RF SVC=98.4% Kumar et al [30] ANN 95% Choudhury et. al [31] SVM 91.37%, 95.72% Srunitha et al [32] SVM 95% Lu et al [33] CNN AUC=91.47% Lamesck et al [34] SVM-poly 94.3% Bhattacharya et al [35] Decision Trees, ANN and SVM 89.34%, 87% and 71.18% Zhao et al [36] ANN 88%, 81% Mengistu et al [37] Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) 89.7% Wu et al [38] Multi SVM with Polynomial Kernel 79.4% and 99.2% Guang et al [39] PLS-DA and Multi SVM with Polynomial Kernel 93.33% and 96.67% Vibhute et al [40] Multi…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022, Nguyen et al [5] proposed a novel classification approach for determining different soil classes utilizing machine learning approaches, specifically support vector classification (SVC), random forest (RF), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) models. The models were developed using a database of 4888 soil samples obtained from Vietnam projects, with 15 soil properties factors selected as input parameters to categorize the samples into 5 soil classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022, Nguyen et al (5) proposed a new classification method for determining different soil classes using machine learning approaches, specifically support vector classification (SVC), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and random forest (RF) models. The models were developed using a database of 4888 soil samples obtained from Vietnam projects, with 15 soil properties factors selected as input parameters to classify the samples into 5 soil classes.…”
Section: Summary Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, image-based soil classification (5) (6) has become a popular research topic due to advances in imaging technology and deep learning techniques. Deep learning models (7) can extract complex features from soil images and accurately classify them into different categories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rauter and Tschuchnigg (2021) developed a classification model based on a dataset, and the algorithms used were SVM, ANN, and Randomfrest with different combinations of input variables. Nguyen (2022) proposes a new classification method for soil samples using three machinelearning models (SVC, MLP, and RF) and 15 input parameters. A database of 4888 soil samples from Vietnam was used for model development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%