2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel apparatus to measure the low-permeability and porosity in tight gas reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By analyzing the changes in the upstream and downstream pressures over time, the permeability of the core can be obtained. Modifications are also made to the primary testing method in order to improve the accuracy and the flexibility, and to decrease the testing time [6,7]. All of these analysis methods are based upon the homogeneous model.…”
Section: Mathematical Models and The Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analyzing the changes in the upstream and downstream pressures over time, the permeability of the core can be obtained. Modifications are also made to the primary testing method in order to improve the accuracy and the flexibility, and to decrease the testing time [6,7]. All of these analysis methods are based upon the homogeneous model.…”
Section: Mathematical Models and The Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly scattered distribution of the lenticular reservoir determines the production characteristics of the gas reservoirs: due to the small scale of the effective sand body, the single well production is low, the stable production capacity is poor, and the single well control reserves and the final accumulated yield are low. Generally, the dynamic reservoir controlled by a single well is less than 30 million cubic meters, and the gas production rate can keep 10,000 cubic meters for three years, then the production rate will keep decline for about 7–10 years until the reservoir pressure is too low to produce (Fan et al., 2016; Jang et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2016).…”
Section: Basic Geological Characteristics Of the Tight Gas Reservoir mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correct the compressive storage, Jones 18 introduced a correction factor “ f 1 ” into the original analytical permeability solution to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the measured permeability. Although the effect of gas compressive storage can be somewhat corrected, the results are still less reliable because the porosity of the sample cannot be estimated precisely 17,21‐23 . Following Jones's work, Cui et al 24 modified “ f 1 ” to account for the effect of gas sorption by incorporating Langmuir constants into the analytical solution, which further extends the applicability of the pulse decay method in permeability measurements of rock reservoirs with gas sorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%