2004
DOI: 10.1002/humu.9245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel and recurrent mutations in theNF1 gene in Italian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1

Abstract: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common autosomal dominant disorders in humans, affecting 1 in 3500 individuals. NF1 is a fully penetrant exhibiting a mutation rate some 10-fold higher compared to most other disease genes. As a consequence, a high number of cases (up to 50%) are sporadic. Mutation detection is complex due to the large size of NF1 gene, the presence of pseudogenes and the great variety of lesions. In the present study we attempted to delineate the NF1 mutational spectrum in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since no further nucleotide variations were detected with direct sequencing in the five DHPLC-negative probands, DHPLC revealed a100% sensitivity compared to that for direct sequencing, which is considered the gold standard in mutational analysis (Xiao and Oefner, 2001); however, DHPLC is much less laborious, time-consuming and expensive. Our results agree with data reported by other groups on DHPLC analysis performed on many other genes, such as BRCA (Gross et al, 1999), NF1 (De Luca et al, 2004), MLH1 and MSH2 (Holinski-Feder et al, 2001). Furthermore, our prospective DHPLC mutation detection rate (89.3%) is very similar to that obtained by direct sequencing on ENG and ALK1 by other groups (Letteboer et al, 2005;Schulte et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Since no further nucleotide variations were detected with direct sequencing in the five DHPLC-negative probands, DHPLC revealed a100% sensitivity compared to that for direct sequencing, which is considered the gold standard in mutational analysis (Xiao and Oefner, 2001); however, DHPLC is much less laborious, time-consuming and expensive. Our results agree with data reported by other groups on DHPLC analysis performed on many other genes, such as BRCA (Gross et al, 1999), NF1 (De Luca et al, 2004), MLH1 and MSH2 (Holinski-Feder et al, 2001). Furthermore, our prospective DHPLC mutation detection rate (89.3%) is very similar to that obtained by direct sequencing on ENG and ALK1 by other groups (Letteboer et al, 2005;Schulte et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…2002; De Luca et al. 2004, 2007), although the findings of an Italian mortality study were consistent with those performed in other industrialized countries (Zöller et al. 1995; Rasmussen et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Although no variants in the NF2 gene were detected, four heterozygous variants in the NF1 gene were identified. Two of these (c.2288T>C/p.L763P, c.574 C>T/p.R192*) were previously reported mutations [13][14][15], and the others (c.768delT/p. F256Lfs*25, c.2229_2230delTG/p.V744Qfs*23) were novel ( Figure 1A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%