2012
DOI: 10.3406/crai.2012.93413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nouvelles recherches archéologiques à Byblos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests the moderate stratigraphic impacts of these edifices. A dearth of diagnostic harbour units at Byblos 51 52 , the pearl of the Phoenician coast during the Bronze Age 53 , further corroborates the findings from Beirut, Sidon and Tyre. The difficulties presented by maritime engineering at this time appear to have been overcome by the extensive use of lighter vessels to load and unload larger trade crafts anchored offshore 54 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This suggests the moderate stratigraphic impacts of these edifices. A dearth of diagnostic harbour units at Byblos 51 52 , the pearl of the Phoenician coast during the Bronze Age 53 , further corroborates the findings from Beirut, Sidon and Tyre. The difficulties presented by maritime engineering at this time appear to have been overcome by the extensive use of lighter vessels to load and unload larger trade crafts anchored offshore 54 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although this hypothesis has not been confirmed by archaeological or textual data yet, two issues must be considered: (1) during the second part of the third millennium BC, Southern Levant experienced important socio-political changes (e.g. Finkelstein and Langgut, 2014) while (2) at the same time, maritime exchanges developed in Eastern Mediterranean and contacts reinforced between Egypt and Central Levant (Byblos) (Genz, in press; Grimal and Francis-Allouche, 2012). ‘Combed Ware’ jars represented the largest quantity of imported ceramics for the Old Kingdom (Sowada, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%