1951
DOI: 10.1051/jphysrad:01951001208078900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nouvelle famille de solutions approchées pour certaines équations de Schrödinger non séparables. Application à l'état fondamental de l'hélium

Abstract: Un mode de formation de solutions approximatives de l'équation de Schrödinger des atomes à deux électrons est exploité systématiquement. Il mène à des fonctions d'onde pourvues de propriétés qui les rapprochent beaucoup de la solution rigoureuse. En les prenant comme fonctions d'essai dans un calcul de variations on détermine la valeur propre de l'état fondamental de l'hélium à I,3 pour I000 près et le potentiel d'ionisation à 4,5 pour I000 près. L'intérêt de la méthode est qu'elle semble bien s'appliquer quan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be expected, at lower energies, the CB1-4B cross sections are much smaller than the corresponding results of the CDW-4B model. A comparison is also made with the continuum-distortedwave-independent-event model (CDW-IEM) of Dunseath and Crothers [54], derived using the correlated Pluvinage wave function [55] ϕ i ( x 1 , x 2 ) = (Z 3 T /π ) exp[−Z T (x 1 + x 2 )] exp(−ikr 12 ) 1 F 1 (1 − iγ, 2, 2ikr 12 ), where γ = −1/(2k) and c(k) is the normalization constant, with k being a nonlinear variational parameter. This wave function contains two entirely uncorrelated hydrogenlike wave functions with the unscreened charge Z T that are multiplied with a corrective r 12 -dependent term of the form exp(−ikr 12 ) 1 F 1 (1 − iγ, 2, 2ikr 12 ).…”
Section: The Results Of Numerical Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be expected, at lower energies, the CB1-4B cross sections are much smaller than the corresponding results of the CDW-4B model. A comparison is also made with the continuum-distortedwave-independent-event model (CDW-IEM) of Dunseath and Crothers [54], derived using the correlated Pluvinage wave function [55] ϕ i ( x 1 , x 2 ) = (Z 3 T /π ) exp[−Z T (x 1 + x 2 )] exp(−ikr 12 ) 1 F 1 (1 − iγ, 2, 2ikr 12 ), where γ = −1/(2k) and c(k) is the normalization constant, with k being a nonlinear variational parameter. This wave function contains two entirely uncorrelated hydrogenlike wave functions with the unscreened charge Z T that are multiplied with a corrective r 12 -dependent term of the form exp(−ikr 12 ) 1 F 1 (1 − iγ, 2, 2ikr 12 ).…”
Section: The Results Of Numerical Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial state, which consists of the incident electron and the bound electrons, will be the product of a plane wave describing the incident electron and a correlated Pluvinage type wavefunction (Pluvinage 1951) describing the two bound ones:…”
Section: The Initial State Wavefunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying mathematical approach in the determination of correlated wavefunction φ i (r 1 , r 2 ) is the concept of semi-separability of the Schrödinger equation, following Pluvinage (1951), where φ i (r 1 , r 2 ), has an explicit dependence on the interelectronic distance r 12 . For some special potentials, V 1 , V 2 and V 12 , the Schrödinger equation is said to be semi-separable if one can solve exactly the two equations below:…”
Section: The Initial State Wavefunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assumed that the three-body wave function could be approximated by three two-body subsystems, each acting independently of the other. This idea is based upon one first formulated by Pluvinage (1950Pluvinage ( , 1951 and later used by Garibotti & Miraglia (1980) and Godunov et al . (1983).…”
Section: Three-body Wave Functions ψ − Ansatzmentioning
confidence: 99%