2017
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2017.1361559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nourishing the Spirit: Exploratory Research on Ayahuasca Experiences along the Continuum of Recovery from Eating Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies on psilocybin, LSD, ketamine, and MDMA took place in the context of clinical research in the US [80][81][82][83][84], Switzerland [85] and the UK [53]. Ibogaine treatments took place in treatment centers in Mexico [86] and Brazil [78,79], while ayahuasca was used in ceremonial [87,88], religious [89] or treatment contexts [90].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All studies on psilocybin, LSD, ketamine, and MDMA took place in the context of clinical research in the US [80][81][82][83][84], Switzerland [85] and the UK [53]. Ibogaine treatments took place in treatment centers in Mexico [86] and Brazil [78,79], while ayahuasca was used in ceremonial [87,88], religious [89] or treatment contexts [90].…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, studies that aimed to address patients' subjective experience of a substance's psychoactive effects [79,84,86,88] contributed mostly to the phenomenology section. The studies that focused on patient experiences of the therapeutic process [82,85,88], aimed to increase the understanding of these complex treatments [81,82,85,90], or (also) aimed to characterize, describe, or determine potential therapeutic mechanisms, effects, and processes [53,82,83,85,87,90] contributed most to the perspectives on the intervention, therapeutic processes and outcomes. While we found quality differences, no articles were excluded based on our quality assessment.…”
Section: Critical Appraisal Of Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations