2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/bibe.2018.00052
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notice of Violation of IEEE Publication Principles: Species Identification Using Partial DNA Sequence: A Machine Learning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure the efficacy of our model, we ran our Naïve Bayes classifier on the first five of the COI gene-based empirical datasets presented in Table I considering their full length barcode sequences. By comparing the results to the maximum accuracy from related studies [12], [49], where comparative performance analysis of different supervised machine learning approaches on those same COI gene-based empirical datasets are provided, we found our Naïve Bayes classifier was competent in its performance (as shown in Figure 2). I to analyze the accuracy responses while varying the barcode sequence lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To ensure the efficacy of our model, we ran our Naïve Bayes classifier on the first five of the COI gene-based empirical datasets presented in Table I considering their full length barcode sequences. By comparing the results to the maximum accuracy from related studies [12], [49], where comparative performance analysis of different supervised machine learning approaches on those same COI gene-based empirical datasets are provided, we found our Naïve Bayes classifier was competent in its performance (as shown in Figure 2). I to analyze the accuracy responses while varying the barcode sequence lengths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…SVM, Jrip, J48 (C4.5), Naïve Bayes were compared on WEKA platforms against those ad-hoc methods by Weitschek et al and it was observed that SVM and Naïve Bayes outperform on average in both synthetic and empirical datasets [12]. Simple-logistic, IBK, PART, Attribute-selected Classifier, Bagging approaches were also implemented in another study [49] in this regard. SMO, BP-NN [50], RF [51], k-mer based approaches [52] [53] can also be perceived in recent studies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kabir et al [20] explores the power of different supervised learning methods for DNA barcode-based classification. To this end, they evaluate different classifiers including Simple Logistic Function [21], (ii) IBk from Lazy classifier [22], (iii) PART from Rule based classifier [23], (iv) Random Forest from Tree based classifier [24], (v) Attribute Selected Classifier, and (vi) Bagging from Meta classifiers [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%