1962
DOI: 10.1080/00797308.1962.11822838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on the Superego

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

1964
1964
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ego-psychology contributed immensely to revising this static, cross-sectional view by proposing a more far-reaching developmental theory of ego and superego development. Freud had postulated that the superego became established in latency after the resolution of the oedipal complex; Hartman and Lowenstein (1962) see the establishment of the superego as an on-going developmental process that begins in latency but continues through adolescence and early adulthood. In their view, what is involved is a constant readjustment between the ego, the ego ideal, and the superego to arrive at a workable equilibrium.…”
Section: Psychoanalytic Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ego-psychology contributed immensely to revising this static, cross-sectional view by proposing a more far-reaching developmental theory of ego and superego development. Freud had postulated that the superego became established in latency after the resolution of the oedipal complex; Hartman and Lowenstein (1962) see the establishment of the superego as an on-going developmental process that begins in latency but continues through adolescence and early adulthood. In their view, what is involved is a constant readjustment between the ego, the ego ideal, and the superego to arrive at a workable equilibrium.…”
Section: Psychoanalytic Theorymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Motivation to attend can be analyzed from the perspective of self-determination motivation theory. Self-determination theory was developed by Ryan (1985, 1991), and is based on organismic theories (Hartmann & Loewenstein, 1962), which views human beings as organisms whose intrinsic or deeply rooted functioning can be assisted or hindered by the social context in which they operate.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical theory and case studies make frequent reference to a maladaptive guilt characterized by chronic self-blame and obsessive rumination over one's transgressions (Blatt 1974, Ellis 1962, Freud 1924/1961, Hartmann & Loewenstein 1962, Rodin et al 1984, Weiss 1993. Recently, however, theorists and researchers have emphasized the adaptive functions of guilt, particularly for interpersonal behavior (Baumeister et al 1994(Baumeister et al , 1995aHoffman 1982;Tangney 1991Tangney , 1994Tangney , 1995bTangney et al 1992;Tangney & Dearing 2002).…”
Section: Hiding Versus Amendingmentioning
confidence: 99%