“…Supporting professional identity development and maintenance was the background to research involving professional identity in 37 studies (23%). Sub-themes included supporting the development and maintenance of professional identity generally (5) (Bartlett, 2008 ; Branch & Frankel, 2016 ; Fleit, 2008 ; Forenza & Eckert, 2018 ; Harris & Guillemin, 2015 ), supporting the development and maintenance of professional identity of the profession or speciality (15), (Healey, 2010 ; Hurley & Lakeman, 2011 ; Iwasaki et al, 2018 ; Karpetis, 2014 ; Lafleur, 2007 ; Mackay & Zufferey, 2015 ; Mellin et al, 2011 ; Moorhead et al, 2016 ; Mousazadeh et al, 2019 ; Salim & Elgizoli, 2016 ; Swickert, 1997 ; Tahim, 2015 ; Thompson et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2015 ) with four specifically in respect to professions regarded as having a poor reputation or low recognition (Leigh, 2014 ; Mallon, 2018 ; Morriss, 2014 ; Sercu et al, 2015 ). Supporting professional identity development and maintenance in relation to boundary crossing was also a reason for research involving professional identity.…”