Notes on the Laws of Motion in Aristotle

Drabkin, I. E.

doi:10.2307/290584

Cited by 23 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…because of this use of symbols in an argument about covariance, some have thought that there are extractable "laws of motion" in aristotle's physics (Drabkin 1938). the claim is strained and relies too much on a modern idea of physical law.…”

Section: Philosophical Ideas About Motionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motion and Energy

Groot¹

2016

A Companion to Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Philosophical Ideas About Motionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motion and Energy

Groot¹

2016

A Companion to Science, Technology, and Medicine in Ancient Greece and Rome

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Certainly, he had not in mind a simple axiomatic structure as in the posterior Newtonian mechanics. Despite that, there are repeated statements in his treatises which can be converted into quantitative mechanical laws [6]. Thus, we can still imagine what an Aristotelian mechanics would look like were it presented in mathematical language.…”

Section: Aristotelian Mechanicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Special relativity as the limit of an Aristotelian universal friction theory under Reye's assumption

Minguzzi¹

2014

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work explores a classical mechanical theory under two further assumptions: (a) there is a universal dry friction force (Aristotelian mechanics), and (b) the variation of the mass of a body due to wear is proportional to the work done by the friction force on the body (Reye's hypothesis). It is shown that mass depends on velocity as in Special Relativity, and that the velocity is constant for a particular characteristic value. In the limit of vanishing friction the theory satisfies a relativity principle as bodies do not decelerate and, therefore, the absolute frame becomes unobservable. However, the limit theory is not Newtonian mechanics, with its Galilei group symmetry, but rather Special Relativity. This result suggests to regard Special Relativity as the limit of a theory presenting universal friction and exchange of mass-energy with a reservoir (vacuum). Thus, quite surprisingly, Special Relativity follows from the absolute space (ether) concept and could have been discovered following studies of Aristotelian mechanics and friction. We end the work confronting the full theory with observations. It predicts the Hubble law through tired light, and hence it is incompatible with supernova light curves unless both mechanisms of tired light (locally) and universe expansion (non-locally) are at work. It also nicely accounts for some challenging numerical coincidences involving phenomena under low acceleration.

show abstract