1961
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on the Elasticity of Derived Demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is relevant for cigarette tax policy that the demand for smoking may be derived from the demand for weight loss. The Hicks–Marshall laws of derived demand (Marshall, ; Bronfenbrenner, ) state the conditions under which a derived demand will be relatively price inelastic: (i) the demand for the ultimate objective is relatively price inelastic; (ii) it is difficult to substitute for the input in the production of the objective; and (iii) expenditures on the input are a relatively small fraction of the total cost of the ultimate objective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is relevant for cigarette tax policy that the demand for smoking may be derived from the demand for weight loss. The Hicks–Marshall laws of derived demand (Marshall, ; Bronfenbrenner, ) state the conditions under which a derived demand will be relatively price inelastic: (i) the demand for the ultimate objective is relatively price inelastic; (ii) it is difficult to substitute for the input in the production of the objective; and (iii) expenditures on the input are a relatively small fraction of the total cost of the ultimate objective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Also, 5 The hi values in Table 2 are larger than KM's total elasticities (Buse, 1958), but smaller than their Marshallian elasticities obtained from Bjørndal et al (1996). The reason for taking this middle ground is to compensate for the fixed-proportions assumption, which introduces inelasticity into the farm-level (derived) demand elasticity (Bronfenbrenner, 1961). A less elastic demand implies larger rents to advertising, ceteris paribus (Dorfman and Steiner, 1954).…”
Section: Parameterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8a)) and A. the corresponding expression under perfect competition (see, e.g. Bronfenbrenner, 1961). Intuitively, for imperfect competition to reduce farmers' incentive to promote, as suggested by Zhang and Sexton's (2000) analysis, one would expect that A.'…”
Section: Market Power and The Derived Demand Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relaxing this assumption complicates the analysis, but does not alter the basic idea that market power's effect on the derived demand elasticity is ambiguous when C5 > 0. The reason is related to Marshall's third law of derived demand as discussed by Bronfenbrenner (1961Bronfenbrenner ( , pp. 2561.…”
Section: Market Power and The Derived Demand Elasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%