1963
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.1963.tb02483.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NOTES ON THE DISTRIBUTION, REPRODUCTION AND DISPLAY OF THE ANDEAN TORRENT DUCK MERGANETTA ARMATA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with a recent phylogenetic review that found no observable differences in the barb density of plumulaceous and pennaceous sections of contour feathers in aquatic birds across environments (Pap et al 2017). Since M. armata are specialized to a similar habitat type, fast flowing torrential rivers (Johnson 1963), there is no a priori reason to expect contour feathers (i.e., the protective layer of plumage) to differ between low- and high-altitude populations. In contrast to the contour feathers, the insulative down may be more sensitive to environmental temperatures, particularly in aquatic birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are consistent with a recent phylogenetic review that found no observable differences in the barb density of plumulaceous and pennaceous sections of contour feathers in aquatic birds across environments (Pap et al 2017). Since M. armata are specialized to a similar habitat type, fast flowing torrential rivers (Johnson 1963), there is no a priori reason to expect contour feathers (i.e., the protective layer of plumage) to differ between low- and high-altitude populations. In contrast to the contour feathers, the insulative down may be more sensitive to environmental temperatures, particularly in aquatic birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historical and current field records show that two dry Andean regions serve as a disjunction between the distribution ranges of M. a. leucogenis and M. a. armata, probably due to the lack or extreme seasonality of torrential rivers in these regions (Conover, 1943;eBird, 2016;Fjeldså & Krabbe, 1990;Johnsgard, 2010;Johnson, 1963). One of these regions is located in the junction ( (Blisniuk, Stern, Chamberlain, Idleman, & Zeitler, 2005;Hartley, 2003;Rabassa, Coronato, & Martínez, 2011;Rabassa, Coronato, & Salemme, 2005;Zachos, Pagani, Sloan, Thomas, & Billups, 2001), the Arid Diagonal is defined by its dry climate and absence of glaciers, a defining feature dividing the Central Andes from Southern Andes and Patagonia ( Figure 1c; and Burniard, 1982;Seltzer, 1990).…”
Section: South American Arid or Dry Diagonalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported seasonal altitudinal movements of torrent ducks, and these movements can be influenced by reproductive season, food availability, variation in the streamflow, and winter conditions, especially in the Southern Andes (Johnsgard, 1966;Johnson, 1963;Pernollet et al, 2012;Ramírez, Botero, & Kattan, 2014). Also during our banding activities in the Chillón River, we recovered two individuals that had moved at least 4 km along the river.…”
Section: Population Structure Among Rivers "Extended Family" Withimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In South America, 3 subspecies of the torrent duck ( Merganetta armata ) inhabit many of the rivers in the west and the east slopes along the Andes Mountains from northwestern Venezuela to southern Chile and Argentina (Conover ). These ducks are small‐bodied diving ducks (350–550 g) that feed primarily on benthic macro‐invertebrates (Johnson , Alvarez et al ) and nest in cliffs, rocks, and tree cavities adjacent to the rivers (Conover , Johnson , Moffet ). Torrent ducks are one of the most difficult species to capture alive for study purposes because of their avoidance behavior and the torrential rivers they inhabit (Johnsgard , Cardona and Kattan ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their natural environment consists mostly of fast‐flowing water, which may be extremely difficult to cross, and in some areas, delimited by inaccessible thick riverine vegetation. However, strong territorial and philopatric behaviors throughout their elevational and latitudinal distribution facilitate the capture and recapture of individuals (Johnson , Johnsgard ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%