1972
DOI: 10.1127/zdgg/123/1972/435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on the Anisian biostratigraphy of the Gebze Area (Kocaeli Peninsula, Turkey)1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The palaeontological data indicate an Anisian to Carnian age for the Kayabaşı Formation. In terms of facies and age, it can be compared with the Triassic sequence in Dobrugea (Seghedi, 2001) and to a lesser degree with the Triassic in the western part of the Istanbul Zone (Yurttaş-Özdemir, 1971; Assereto, 1972); however, the conodont fauna in the Istanbul–Gebze region is quite different (Gedik, 1975; A. M. Kılıç, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Cumhuriyet Univ., 2004).…”
Section: The Küre Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The palaeontological data indicate an Anisian to Carnian age for the Kayabaşı Formation. In terms of facies and age, it can be compared with the Triassic sequence in Dobrugea (Seghedi, 2001) and to a lesser degree with the Triassic in the western part of the Istanbul Zone (Yurttaş-Özdemir, 1971; Assereto, 1972); however, the conodont fauna in the Istanbul–Gebze region is quite different (Gedik, 1975; A. M. Kılıç, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, Cumhuriyet Univ., 2004).…”
Section: The Küre Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…southwards, opening the Western Black Sea basin during the Cretaceous (e.g., Okay et al 1994Okay et al , 2018Okay & Tüysüz 1999;Okay & Görür 2007;Tari et al 2015;Tüysüz 2018). The Triassic succesion of the Istanbul Terrane/Zone, as described by Yurttaş-Özdemir (1971), Assereto (1972), Fantini Sestini (1988), and Gaetani (2016), has no counterpart, neither by its lithology nor by its ammonoid and brachiopod faunas, in the Triassic successions of any of the geological units supposedly underlying the 'Odessa Shelf', i.e., in the Triassic successions of the Scythian and Moesian platforms and particularly in the Triassic successions of the North Dobrogean Orogen. Moreover, the Triassic successions drilled in the Histria Depression, located in the Romanian Western Black Sea shelf in the eastward offshore prolongation of the North Dobrogean Orogen (Grădinaru et al 1989;Cătuneanu & Maftei 1994), are not to be found in the Istanbul Terrane/Zone.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to (Konstantinov, 1991а;p. 42), "the adoption of the genus Nicomedites as an ancestor for the boreal genera Gymnotoceras and Frechites, which is mainly known from Tethyan realms, in particular, Asia Minor (Assereto, 1972(Assereto, , 1974Toula, 1896), is poorly justified". Bucher (1988) considered the genus Eogymnotoceras, widespread in Beds with Augastaceras escheri and Beds with Platycuccoceras praebalatonensis of the Nevadisculites taylori Zone, as well as in the lower part of the Balatonites shoshonensis Zone of Nevada as an ancestor of the genus Gymnotoceras.…”
Section: The System and Phylogeny Of Beyrichitidaementioning
confidence: 99%