2005
DOI: 10.29203/ka.2005.409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on some rare polypores, found in Russia 2. Junghuhnia vitellina sp. nova, plus genera Cinereomyces and Skeletocutis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spirin (2005) included Skeletocutis lenis and S. vulgaris in Cinereomyces, but Miettinen and Larsson (2010) showed them to belong to a new genus in Hymenochaetales, Sidera, and concluded that Cinereomyces should be considered monotypic, i.e. containing only C. lindbladii.…”
Section: Cinereomycesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Spirin (2005) included Skeletocutis lenis and S. vulgaris in Cinereomyces, but Miettinen and Larsson (2010) showed them to belong to a new genus in Hymenochaetales, Sidera, and concluded that Cinereomyces should be considered monotypic, i.e. containing only C. lindbladii.…”
Section: Cinereomycesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Later, Niemelä (2005) accepted Cinereomyces (Jülich 1982) typified with C. lindbladii, and the new combination Cinereomyces lenis (Spirin 2005). C. lindbladii and C. lenis share many characters: they are both resupinate white-rot fungi usually found on rotten logs, have acyanophilous hyphae and middle-sized allantoid spores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The genus Cinereomyces was described as monotypic (Jülich 1982: 396). Other authors have sought to widen the concept (Niemelä 2005, Spirin 2005 by including Skeletocutis lenis (P. Karst.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%