2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2005.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on “pseudo-t-norms and implication operators on a complete Brouwerian lattice” and “pseudo-t-norms and implication operators: direct products and direct product decompositions”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption of particular operators satisfying several properties, which imply Equation (3), was the main problem arose in [58], which was noted in [28] and clarified in [56]. Hence, the results above also fixed the impossibility of assuming these properties in particular operators.…”
Section: Corollary 27 Given the Complete Latticesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The assumption of particular operators satisfying several properties, which imply Equation (3), was the main problem arose in [58], which was noted in [28] and clarified in [56]. Hence, the results above also fixed the impossibility of assuming these properties in particular operators.…”
Section: Corollary 27 Given the Complete Latticesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Consequently, the t-norm can be replaced by a weak t-norm, t-seminorm or strong pseudo-t-norm. See Fodor (1991), De Cooman andKerre (1994), Han and Li (2005), Wang and Xiong (2005) and Han et al (2006) for details. More general composite operators were also investigated in CuninghameGreen (1979CuninghameGreen ( , 1995, Kawaguchi and Miyakoshi (1998), Cheng and Peng (1988), Noskoá (2005), and Wu (2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…associativity and commutativity, are not necessary in defining fuzzy relational equations and hence some general composite operators can be used without losing any particular property of interest. As a consequent, some generalizations have been made by Cheng and Peng (1988), Di , Kawaguchi and Miyakoshi (1998), Han and Li (2005), Li et al (2005), Wang and Xiong (2005) and Han et al (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Han et al (2006) and Abbasi discussed sup-T p equations on I = [0, 1] while Wang and Xiong (2005), and Zhang et al (2008) extended the results to the case of complete lattices, where T p is a strong pseudo-t-norm as introduced by Yu (2002, 2003) and Han and Li (2005). Note that a strong pseudo-t-norm can be either a conjunctor, a coimplicator or neither.…”
Section: As Shown In De Baetsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The definition of a pseudo-t-norm was proposed by Yu (2002, 2003) while Han and Li (2005) introduced the concept of a strong pseudo-t-norm by imposing a boundary condition T p (a, 0) = 0, ∀ a ∈ L, which, by Theorem 2.2, is necessary for the existence of an upper right adjoint of T p . However, a strong pseudo-t-norm may not be a conjunctor since the monotonicity in its first argument cannot be guaranteed.…”
Section: Definition 224mentioning
confidence: 99%