Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Computational Linguistics - 1994
DOI: 10.3115/991886.991953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on LR parser design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a sufficiently large corpus parsed by the original, general, grammar, it is possible to identify the common combinations of grammar rules and "chunk" them into "macro-rules". The result is a "specialized" grammar; this has a larger number of rules, but a simpler structure, allowing it in practice to be parsed very much more quickly using an LR-based method [23]. The coverage of the specialized grammar is a strict subset of that of the original grammar; thus any analysis produced by the specialized grammar is guaranteed to be valid in the original one as well.…”
Section: Linguistically Motivated Robustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a sufficiently large corpus parsed by the original, general, grammar, it is possible to identify the common combinations of grammar rules and "chunk" them into "macro-rules". The result is a "specialized" grammar; this has a larger number of rules, but a simpler structure, allowing it in practice to be parsed very much more quickly using an LR-based method [23]. The coverage of the specialized grammar is a strict subset of that of the original grammar; thus any analysis produced by the specialized grammar is guaranteed to be valid in the original one as well.…”
Section: Linguistically Motivated Robustmentioning
confidence: 99%