1986
DOI: 10.2307/2807080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on Leguminosae: Papilionoideae of the Southeastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutrient‐acquisition strategies are likely to vary among the approximately 280 lupine species worldwide. The unifoliate lupines in southeastern United States show phylogenetic affinity with the Old World lupines (Drummond, 2008; Eastwood et al, 2008), and several of these produce cluster roots and grow on dunal and/or open sandy, relatively infertile soils (Isely, 1986) (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Soil‐type Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient‐acquisition strategies are likely to vary among the approximately 280 lupine species worldwide. The unifoliate lupines in southeastern United States show phylogenetic affinity with the Old World lupines (Drummond, 2008; Eastwood et al, 2008), and several of these produce cluster roots and grow on dunal and/or open sandy, relatively infertile soils (Isely, 1986) (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Soil‐type Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In North America the collections of drift disseminules on Floridia shores do not include Vigna. Most probably this is because both V. luteola and V. marina are native to this region (Isely, 1986). An origin in Africa is possible but unlikely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This G. erecta specimen was otherwise annotated only by Anita F. Cholewa in 1986, erroneously as a probable isotype of G. brachypoda . When Isely (1986) mentioned that G. brachypoda could be a “freak form” of G. erecta , he also stated that there were “two Chapman sheets [of G. brachypoda ] at NY” and that G. brachypoda had pedunculate inflorescences, unlike this G. erecta specimen. Ward and Craighead (1990) speculated G. brachypoda was “probably an aberrant form” of G. erecta , and later Ward and Hall (2004) also stated that G. brachypoda was “based upon two A.W.…”
Section: Typificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the descriptions of a decumbent (Vail 1895, Small 1903, Small 1933), ascending or sprawling (Isely 1986), procumbent (Nesom 2015), or prostrate habit (Nesom 2017) for G. brachypoda appear to be based on speculation from specimens and not field observations. While it was conjectured that it was impossible for G. brachypoda to be erect because its type specimens had stems to 37 cm long (Nesom 2017), another collection identified as G. brachypoda ( Anderson 15642 [FSU, GA]) with stems well over 40 cm long described on its label “robust, erect plants with limited twining” and was noted to be very similar to the type specimens of G. brachypoda (Franck 2017a, Nesom 2017).…”
Section: Typificationmentioning
confidence: 99%