2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1912.10642
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on Category Theory with examples from basic mathematics

Paolo Perrone

Abstract: Spivak, and more recently Walter Tholen, for the interesting discussions, some of which were reflected in the way I taught this course and wrote these notes.• Finally I want to thank Tobias Fritz, who had the patience to teach category theory to me. Notation and conventionsWe will follow for the most part the notation and conventions of [Rie16]. The typesetting is slightly different.• We denote categories by boldface capitalized words, such as C and Set.• We denote functors by uppercase letters, such as F : C … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition of these two functors then defines a comonad on PROCTHEORY which, in particular, takes FUNC to PREFUNC. This is closely related to [86,Ex. 4…”
Section: B Subsuming the Framework Of Classical Causal Modelingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The composition of these two functors then defines a comonad on PROCTHEORY which, in particular, takes FUNC to PREFUNC. This is closely related to [86,Ex. 4…”
Section: B Subsuming the Framework Of Classical Causal Modelingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is then straightforward to verify that C W is indeed also a Markov category. We can alternatively think of C W as the co-Kleisli category of the reader comonad 5 W ⊗ on C (see for example [25,Section 5.3]). Note that, while the reader comonad is usually defined on cartesian monoidal categories, the only property of cartesian monoidal categories that is actually used in the definition is that the object W has a comonoid structure, and thus this co-Kleisli category still makes sense in our context.…”
Section: Parametric Markov Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will implement that extension by equipping each joint density kernel with an extra likelihood factor via a writer monad, referring to the resulting factors as likelihoood weights. Perrone [Perrone, 2019] described the writer monad for arbitrary monoids (A, , 1) in his Example 5.1.7, so Proposition 6.12 will only quickly review its construction. Proposition 6.12 (Weights form a writer monad).…”
Section: Unnormalized Densities Via a Writer Monad Of Weightsmentioning
confidence: 99%