1984
DOI: 10.1075/sl.8.2.05del
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes on Agentivity and Causation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although I am not the only linguist who distinguishes semantic relations in this way (cf. Chomsky 1981, Fillmore 1968, Levin 1983, Marantz 1984, and Perlmutter & Postal 1977, this is small comfort (see DeLancey 1984;Dowty 1988). Even though there is no theoretical account of semantic relations there is strong empirical evidence for the operation of some basic set of semantic relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although I am not the only linguist who distinguishes semantic relations in this way (cf. Chomsky 1981, Fillmore 1968, Levin 1983, Marantz 1984, and Perlmutter & Postal 1977, this is small comfort (see DeLancey 1984;Dowty 1988). Even though there is no theoretical account of semantic relations there is strong empirical evidence for the operation of some basic set of semantic relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rain-nom /snow-nom /hail-nom come-ind 'It is raining/snowing/hailing. ' Second, as was already hinted at above and as has been discussed by, for example, DeLancey (1984) and Dowty (1991) for agent, and Rappaport Hovav & Levin (2008) for goal and recipient, verbs do not strictly assign their arguments a single role but allow variation. One of the roles, such as Dowty's proto-agent, may be seen as the expected role, while deviations from it need to be highlighted, for example, by modifying the marking of argument(s).…”
Section: Previous Approaches To Semantic Rolesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Por otra parte la idea de que se acude mas facilmente a una pasiva cuando el agente no es prototipico (cf. DeLancey (1984), Van Oosten (1986: 136 ss. )), esta sujeta a una dobie matización: se puede mantener a condición de restringir la noción de agente prototipico a las entidades animadas especificas, y con tal de dejar fuera de consideración las construcciones participiales adnominales.…”
Section: Urdir Vulnerarunclassified