2013
DOI: 10.1093/ijtj/ijt002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notes from the Field: Silence Kills! Women and the Transitional Justice Process in Post-Revolutionary Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While several scholars have argued that such a far-reaching objective is beyond the remit of TJ interventions with a delimited lifespan and resources (de Greiff 2020), arguments in favor of moving from this notion of transformative reparations toward an understanding of disruptive reparations can be found both in the early practice and conceptual history of TJ, which was inherently disruptive in nature. Returning to and foregrounding these disruptive roots of TJ is increasingly uncommon in the current context of institutionalization, legalization and professionalization of the field, but would nonetheless be in line with the expectations of many victims (Gray 2018; Robins et al 2022; Vatthauer and Weipert-Fenner 2017). The notion of disruptive reparations also avoids the potential depoliticizing of reparations programs that may happen when they move closer to development programs without a clear critical and theoretical underpinning framing their specificities and normative objectives.…”
Section: Theorizing the Tunisian Approach Through The Lens Of Disrupt...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While several scholars have argued that such a far-reaching objective is beyond the remit of TJ interventions with a delimited lifespan and resources (de Greiff 2020), arguments in favor of moving from this notion of transformative reparations toward an understanding of disruptive reparations can be found both in the early practice and conceptual history of TJ, which was inherently disruptive in nature. Returning to and foregrounding these disruptive roots of TJ is increasingly uncommon in the current context of institutionalization, legalization and professionalization of the field, but would nonetheless be in line with the expectations of many victims (Gray 2018; Robins et al 2022; Vatthauer and Weipert-Fenner 2017). The notion of disruptive reparations also avoids the potential depoliticizing of reparations programs that may happen when they move closer to development programs without a clear critical and theoretical underpinning framing their specificities and normative objectives.…”
Section: Theorizing the Tunisian Approach Through The Lens Of Disrupt...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their punishment included harassment, expulsion from school, rape, the threat of rape, etc. (Gray and Coonan 2013, Mhajne and Brandt 2020, Wolf 2017, Zaki 2018). Islamists' mobilization skills and narrative as a marginalized majority helped them re‐emerge on the political scene after the fall of the secular regime in January of 2011.…”
Section: Tunisia's Islamists: a Brief Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'une des incarnations les plus frappantes de cette violence fut le cas des prisonnières politiques. Doris Gray et Terry Coonan (2013), à la suite des entrevues menées auprès de 80 anciennes détenues et de plusieurs femmes de prisonniers, dressent le portrait suivant. Les données sur les femmes détenues sont très variables puisque nombre d'entre elles étaient emprisonnées secrètement, mais elles oscilleraient entre 300 et 1 500.…”
Section: En Route Vers La Démocratieunclassified