2019
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1569694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note-taking habits of 21st Century college students: implications for student learning, memory, and achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In some studies, it was claimed that female students recorded more important ideas than the male students, yet they were less successful than the male students (Hartley, 1976;Daly, 1983). However, in many studies (Reddington et al, 2015;Morehead et al, 2019), it was revealed that females took notes more effectively than males. On the other hand, there are also some studies (Rahmani and Sadeghi, 2011;White, 2017) suggesting that there are no significant differences between female and male students with regard to note taking success.…”
Section: öZçakmak 587mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, it was claimed that female students recorded more important ideas than the male students, yet they were less successful than the male students (Hartley, 1976;Daly, 1983). However, in many studies (Reddington et al, 2015;Morehead et al, 2019), it was revealed that females took notes more effectively than males. On the other hand, there are also some studies (Rahmani and Sadeghi, 2011;White, 2017) suggesting that there are no significant differences between female and male students with regard to note taking success.…”
Section: öZçakmak 587mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these methods provide structure, students often read and analyze in isolation, as the methods do not facilitate virtual and open peer collaboration. Additionally, note-taking is a skill that is not commonly taught or emphasized in science courses (10). To create an inclusive and empowering environment of cocreation of knowledge, we've infused an upper-division metagenomics course with activities to reduce the anxiety of reading primary literature and note-taking and promote collective and collaborative constructivism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…278] о том, что многие исследователи считают необходимым помочь студентам выбрать хорошие методы конспектирования, нами найдено не было, скорее всего, потому что сравнительных исследований эффективности разных методов не проводились. Вместе с тем, поскольку некоторые исследования показали, что студенты не всегда могут принимать наилучшие решения о том, как и когда делать конспект [15], мы переформулируем тезис следующим образом: преподавателям имеет смысл предлагать студентам различные варианты конспектирования, объяснив их суть.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified