2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4908573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note: Strain sensitivity comparison between fiber Bragg gratings inscribed on 125 and 80 micron cladding diameter fibers, case study on the solidification monitoring of a photo-curable resin

Abstract: The influence of fiber Bragg grating diameter when measuring strain is investigated and quantified. Two fiber Bragg gratings with bare cladding diameter of 125 μm and 80 μm are produced by excimer laser irradiation through a phase mask, and are used to simultaneously monitor the Bragg wavelength shift due to the strain produced by the solidification of a photo-curable resin during light exposure. It is found that the ratio of the measured strains in the two fiber Bragg gratings is close to the inverse ratio of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He found that the resin experienced a non-uniform compressive strain due to the photo-polymer solidification. Maccioni et al [14] investigated the effect of the cladding diameter on the strain measurement. They reported that the longitudinal force F is proportional to the outer surface of the optical fiber, i.e., F 9 cladding diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found that the resin experienced a non-uniform compressive strain due to the photo-polymer solidification. Maccioni et al [14] investigated the effect of the cladding diameter on the strain measurement. They reported that the longitudinal force F is proportional to the outer surface of the optical fiber, i.e., F 9 cladding diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strain transfer functions were initially developed for FO measurements in the late 1990s and early 2000s [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ] where the strain transfer relationship was deemed to be a function of the properties of the adhesive [ 18 , 19 ] and the geometry of the glued area, i.e., the adhesive thickness, width and bonding length [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. More recent studies have investigated the detailed nature and geometry of the bonded environment and across a range of glues and epoxy resin types [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%