1985
DOI: 10.1016/0020-708x(85)90035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on the scattering corrections in 2πα counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As electrons backscatter easily from the backing, the applicability is limited to alpha-particle emitters, for which significant correction factors have to be taken into account [7]. These have been studied theoretically [25][26][27][28], experimentally [29][30][31][32][33][34] and by simulations [35][36][37][38][39]. From the energy and angular distribution of the backscattered αparticles, one can conclude that backscattering is primarily due to a large number of interactions with atomic electrons and rarely by nuclear collisions (Rutherford scattering).…”
Section: π Proportional Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As electrons backscatter easily from the backing, the applicability is limited to alpha-particle emitters, for which significant correction factors have to be taken into account [7]. These have been studied theoretically [25][26][27][28], experimentally [29][30][31][32][33][34] and by simulations [35][36][37][38][39]. From the energy and angular distribution of the backscattered αparticles, one can conclude that backscattering is primarily due to a large number of interactions with atomic electrons and rarely by nuclear collisions (Rutherford scattering).…”
Section: π Proportional Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally these corrections were evaluated theoretically by using simplified scattering models, such as those of Crawford [1], White [2] or Lucas and Hutchinson [3]. Some results for the experimental determination of the backscattering coefficient are given in the literature [4][5][6][7], although they are generally subject to large uncertainties because the net contribution of the backscattered particles to the total counting rate is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These corrections have been theoretically studied by several workers [1][2][3][4][5], generally assuming models that take into account the multiple scattering of particles, most of them based on the general theory of multiple scattering from Williams [6]. These corrections can also be estimated experimentally [7][8][9][10], but it requires the measurement of a great number of sources prepared with a wide range of thicknesses and using a substrate with a similar chemical composition to the source of interest. An alternative method to calculate the desired corrections to the counting rate in 2 detection systems is the use of Monte Carlo simulation to model the behavior of the particles in the source and backing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%