1941
DOI: 10.1172/jci101256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on the Interpretation of Clearance Methods in the Diseased Kidney

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1942
1942
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gradual reduction in renal functions observed is in accord with studies on urea clearance, blood urea nitrogen, and concentrating ability of kidneys reported by Lewis and Alving (15 (5) and Smith (16). While the adequacy of these assumptions has been tested in young adults, there is no reason to believe that chronological age influences their validity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The gradual reduction in renal functions observed is in accord with studies on urea clearance, blood urea nitrogen, and concentrating ability of kidneys reported by Lewis and Alving (15 (5) and Smith (16). While the adequacy of these assumptions has been tested in young adults, there is no reason to believe that chronological age influences their validity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Smith has emphasized the limitations of the clearance methods in the diseased kidney (5). The use of mannitol as a measure of glomerular filtration is based on the assumption that none of the filtered mannitol is reabsorbed by the tubules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly when a marked decrease in the renal extraction of PAH occurs, as has been adequately shown to be the case following total renal ischemia in the dog by Selkurt (16) and Phillips and Hamilton ( 11 ), the clearance of this substance cannot be used as a significant measure of effective renal plasma flow. These limitations of the clearance methods were early emphasized by Smith (17).…”
Section: Phillips and Hamiltonmentioning
confidence: 99%