1928
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1928.sp002517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on the electric response of nerve to two stimuli

Abstract: IN a previous paper by Gerard, Hill and Zotterman(i) on the effect of frequency of stimulation on the heat-production of frog's nerve, the return of the power of liberating energy after a previous impulse was given as a function of the interval between the stimulus and its predecessor. The "total action current" also at various frequencies of stimulation was recorded with a sensitive Downing galvanometer, and it was shown that this bears a relation to the frequency of stimulation which is very similar to that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1929
1929
1934
1934

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LXVIII. 1 THE GALVANOMETER. The galvanometer used in these experiments is similar to that previously described by Downing(2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LXVIII. 1 THE GALVANOMETER. The galvanometer used in these experiments is similar to that previously described by Downing(2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ZOTTERMAN (1) has recently reported that the electric response of nerve to two stimuli, when measured by the maximal deflection of a sensitive moving-magnet galvanometer, fails to reach a full doubling of the value given by the single nerve impulse until the stimulus interval is made longer than 50ar. We have continued the study of this effect, and have confirmed and extended the observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there is really no reason to expect a greater reduction, for hitherto all experiments concerned with the point have measured the total electric effect of all the fibres in a nerve and the results have been complicated by the differences in recovery rate in different fibres (cf. Zotterman, 1928, Amberson, 1929. The present records suggest that the nerve fibre's capacity to develop the action potential returns at least as rapidly as the excitability and possibly more rapidly, and in this they agree with results obtained by Matthews ( u n p u) on single fibres nerve activated by end organ stimulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%