2000
DOI: 10.1007/bf02904242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on hit-and-miss topologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following theorem is a generalization of classical results holding for hit and miss hypertopologies, [12,52]. In [52], L. Zsilinszki considers spaces that are weakly R 0 , i.e., every nonempty difference of open sets contains a non-empty closed subset of X. We will use an analogous property that holds for regular open and regular closed sets.…”
Section: Consider Now τ ⩕mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The following theorem is a generalization of classical results holding for hit and miss hypertopologies, [12,52]. In [52], L. Zsilinszki considers spaces that are weakly R 0 , i.e., every nonempty difference of open sets contains a non-empty closed subset of X. We will use an analogous property that holds for regular open and regular closed sets.…”
Section: Consider Now τ ⩕mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The reader should note that the equivalence (2 ⇔ 3) in Theorem 5 can be viewed as a consequence of a general result of Zsilinszky [30,Theorem 2.3].…”
Section: Lemma 7 Let X Be a Topological Space In Which All Saturated mentioning
confidence: 99%