1956
DOI: 10.2307/3001756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on Fitting the Multi-Hit Survival Curve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Survivor counts of spores irradiated in peas, chicken soup, and pork are presented in Tables 1 through 3. The general multi-hit curve (5) was fitted using the objective statistical procedure of IGmball ( 4 ) as modified by Gurian (2). Unfortunately, this method, which has proven useful with relatively non-resistant organisms, fits experimental points at the top of the curve very closely at the expense of points several log cycles down.…”
Section: R E S U L T S and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Survivor counts of spores irradiated in peas, chicken soup, and pork are presented in Tables 1 through 3. The general multi-hit curve (5) was fitted using the objective statistical procedure of IGmball ( 4 ) as modified by Gurian (2). Unfortunately, this method, which has proven useful with relatively non-resistant organisms, fits experimental points at the top of the curve very closely at the expense of points several log cycles down.…”
Section: R E S U L T S and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…historically tend to target family members for reasons of profit, use poison as their method of murder, kill locally or within a specific place, and kill within 6 years or less." 224 Thus, while they account for a small fraction of all serial murders, their behavior and motivations are quite distinct. A handful of other noteworthy demographic characteristics necessarily require attention when understanding serial killer profiles.…”
Section: A Review Of Serial Crime Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighting factor W j " ' , in this situation, best applies. The weighting factors proposed by Kimball (1953) and Gurian (1956) are equivalent to ( l j land 1 respectively for the least squares treatment of expression (1) used herein.…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A refinement of this procedure given by Kimball (1953) employs graphical analysis to avoid some of the hand computational drudgery entailed by a completely iterative procedure. Gurian (1956) greatly increased the versatility of Kimball's method by calling attention to t'he importance of using a statistical weighting function appropriate to the observed and/or suspected variability in experimental technique and measure. During the last few years, medium and high speed computers have become increasingly more accessible t o the researcher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%