2017
DOI: 10.5902/2358198026215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Notas históricas sobre a família Cactaceae no Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil) e Uruguai. I – Período Clássico (1818-1950): viajantes naturalistas e botânicos europeus

Abstract: O histórico das descobertas de cactáceas no Rio Grande do Sul e Uruguai é examinado a partir de registros literários dos viajantes naturalistas, horticultores e botânicos que se dedicaram à prospecção e ao estudo destas plantas no espaço regional.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the southern South American (sSA) species of Opuntia have a confused taxonomic history. Many of these taxa were described based on materials collected by Old World naturalists that were travelling to the New World and sending biological materials to European gardens (Pontes et al 2017). That routine led to many names, which were poorly described, based on morphotypes grown under greenhouses conditions, with insufficient diagnoses or use of characters and usually without the designation of nomenclatural types (Haworth 1812; Pfeiffer 1837; Salm-Dyck 1850).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the southern South American (sSA) species of Opuntia have a confused taxonomic history. Many of these taxa were described based on materials collected by Old World naturalists that were travelling to the New World and sending biological materials to European gardens (Pontes et al 2017). That routine led to many names, which were poorly described, based on morphotypes grown under greenhouses conditions, with insufficient diagnoses or use of characters and usually without the designation of nomenclatural types (Haworth 1812; Pfeiffer 1837; Salm-Dyck 1850).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%