2019
DOI: 10.1080/14754835.2019.1588715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not Taking it on Faith: State and Religious Influences on European Court of Human Rights Judges in Freedom of Religion Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have, thus, looked into the possible role of religion in selecting/appointing international judges, but also in international human rights adjudication, 16 notably in the freedom of religion matters and cases involving a complex relationship between women's human rights and religion (for example, abortion rights). 17 Other contributions have considered whether there is a religious diversity gap on the international bench and justifications for the promotion of such diversity among international judges, including the enhancement of the international courts' normative legitimacy, fight against systematic religious discrimination and the 'value-added' argument. 18 Furthermore, one study also surveys individual (separate and dissenting) opinions by ICJ judges looking therein for religious text citations to establish whether these judges incorporate their religious identity in their judging.…”
Section: The Effects Of Judges' Religion or Beliefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have, thus, looked into the possible role of religion in selecting/appointing international judges, but also in international human rights adjudication, 16 notably in the freedom of religion matters and cases involving a complex relationship between women's human rights and religion (for example, abortion rights). 17 Other contributions have considered whether there is a religious diversity gap on the international bench and justifications for the promotion of such diversity among international judges, including the enhancement of the international courts' normative legitimacy, fight against systematic religious discrimination and the 'value-added' argument. 18 Furthermore, one study also surveys individual (separate and dissenting) opinions by ICJ judges looking therein for religious text citations to establish whether these judges incorporate their religious identity in their judging.…”
Section: The Effects Of Judges' Religion or Beliefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the role of religion in the public sphere[and]...the veil is commonly perceived as a symbol of women's oppression in Muslim communities, based on the argument that women do not wear it by choice but out of social pressure. This type of restriction has been upheld by the European Court of Human Rights(Koev 2019) and the Court of Justice of the European Union with regard to restrictions by private companies in the workplace, as long as it is in the context of a neutral dress code (Pin & Witte 2020). The secular quality of these restrictions is supported by studies which show that religious Europeans are more accepting of Muslim head coverings than secular Europeans(Helbling 2014;van der Noll et al 2018) These three prominent examples of how secular values can be given, in law, priority over religion demonstrate that there is a clash between religious values and the concept of human rights.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%