2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not Parking Lots but Parks: A Joint Association of Parks and Transit Stations with Travel Behavior

Abstract: Urban design literature says that public open space in a station area could promote walking and other types of physical activity, enhance place attractiveness, and increase property values. In the context of station areas, however, there is a lack of empirical studies on the relationship between the presence of parks and sustainable travel behavior, which is one of the primary goals of transit-oriented developments (TODs). This study examined the impact of park provision on transit users’ mode choice in three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in general, it offers stop-to-stop services (rather than door-to-door services) and thus cannot cover every location of a city [ 8 ]. Poor transit accessibility, particularly in periphery areas, makes it hard, if not impossible, to reach a goal of offering convenient transport services, thereby generating first- and last-mile challenges for commuters [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in general, it offers stop-to-stop services (rather than door-to-door services) and thus cannot cover every location of a city [ 8 ]. Poor transit accessibility, particularly in periphery areas, makes it hard, if not impossible, to reach a goal of offering convenient transport services, thereby generating first- and last-mile challenges for commuters [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, focus is on patterns of work commutes and daily errands. Any physical activity or recreational experience is merely a positive side effect (Langlois et al 2016;Park et al 2019;Sreedhara et al 2019;Thornton et al 2013;Thrun, Leider, and Chriqui 2016;Yang et al 2019). Similarly, regarding recreation as an issue for land use planning, we see how recreational land uses are rendered as transit corridors, rather than space for recreational activities.…”
Section: Mobilities For and As Recreationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al (2018) provide a detailed description of how geography, in the form of street networks for recreational walking differs from old and new TOD neighbourhoods in Hong Kong. Meng et al (2021) and Park et al (2019) disclose the need for parks as places for recreational activities, an amenity that today is lacking, according to Meng et al (2021). Deponte, Fossa, and Gorrini (2020) use the effects of recent Covid-19 restrictions to show how density poses a risk of crowding and congestion and argues for a rediscovery of the low-medium density city.…”
Section: Land Use Network and Places For Recreationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhancing urban form potential [46]; Supply of developable land [47]; Design of built environment [48] Physical activity Descriptive statistical analysis; statistical model; multinomial logistic regression Describing travel behavior of residents [49]; Mobility choice [50]; Changes in walking [51] Transportation…”
Section: Distribution Of Theme and Domain Co-occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%