Not Just “Teaching Robotics” but “Teaching through Robotics”

Eliasz, Andrew

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03986-7_25

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This motivated the initiation of the research. The earliest publications in this field came from two conference papers published (Buechley et al, 2008;Eliasz, 2009). The publications continue to grow.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Implementation of Arduino Microcontroller Boards in Science: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2008 to 2022

Prabowo,

Irwanto

2023

JEET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The name "Ardui no " made i t s international debut in 2005, marking the age of Arduino as one of the most user-friendly and costeffective microcontroller boards (MCBs) for novices. The science implementation of Arduino boards in automation, networking and data acquisition has been increasing steadily. This study provides a thorough Bibliometric analysis from 1122 papers focused on the Scopus database of published microcontroller research, from the first year the Arduino keyword appeared in 2008 until 2022. Various science articles indexed by Scopus and referring to the use of Arduino MCBs are selected. The Bibliometric analysis explores comprehensive and general key attributes that form a trend from the Scopus articles based on authors, titles, publication years, keywords, citations, affiliations, abstracts, funding information, and languages. The generated data is visualized and analyzed to find patterns that appear within the time span. This study found a significant increase in the number of articles on Arduino boards in Biology, Physics, Chemistry, Science, and STEM category ofthe paper. Despite using only the Scopus database, this study opens up to view the direction of the growing application of Arduino boards in Science. The use of B i b l i o m e t r i c a n a l y s i s ma p s t h e s c i e n t i f i c implementation of Arduino boards as an extensive guide for future collaborations in education and industry. Keywords: Arduino, Bibliometric, Microcontroller Boards, Science, Sensor, STEM

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Implementation of Arduino Microcontroller Boards in Science: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2008 to 2022

Prabowo,

Irwanto

2023

JEET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Features such as low/middle cost, interdisciplinarity, simplified programming environments, and easy robot construction are key for the success of a robotic platform for education [2]. Recently, a trend which considers robotics as a tool for teaching other elements in the curriculum instead of robotics itself [3] may be found, and especially in computing and electronics curricula [4][5][6][7]. Some advantages are the practice knowledge that students may learn, a better assimilation of concepts, and the interdisciplinary magnitude of the activities to be carried out [8][9][10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and implementation of intelligent systems with LEGO Mindstorms for undergraduate computer engineers

Cuéllar

Pegalajar

2011

Comp Applic In Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:We provide a set of projects to put in practice artificial intelligence techniques using LEGO Mindstorms in an undergraduate computer degree, covering reactive and deliberative agents, rule-based systems, graph search algorithms, and planning methods. The projects have been applied for teaching in a third-year undergraduate subject of a computer engineering degree at the University of Granada (Spain). After the contextualization and development of the projects, we discuss the results, advantages, and drawbacks of our experience. ß

show abstract

Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?

Özüorçun

Biçen

2017

EURASIA J MATH SCI T

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Applied courses are difficult to teach to undergraduate engineering students in classical classrooms. To facilitate students' understanding and capture their motivation, technology should be incorporated into classrooms. In the Engineering Faculty, there are courses that are difficult to learn in a classical classroom and laboratory sessions; the programming algorithm course is one such class. Educational robots are required for teaching and learning programming algorithm logic. The Lego Mindstorms EV3 robots represent excellent technology to teach programming algorithm course subjects. The important point about the programming algorithms course is that it enables understanding of the logic of programming, as it enhances students' understanding of what it means when they are coding. This paper investigates how engineering faculty students' achievements are affected by robotics technology when learning computer programming algorithm logics. It analyses a usable solution with the Lego Mindstorms EV3 robot in the engineering classrooms for the introduction to computer programming course. The statistical results showed, Lego robot usage has raised student achievement in the introduction to computer programming course.

show abstract

Not Just “Teaching Robotics” but “Teaching through Robotics”

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

The Implementation of Arduino Microcontroller Boards in Science: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2008 to 2022

The Implementation of Arduino Microcontroller Boards in Science: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2008 to 2022

Design and implementation of intelligent systems with LEGO Mindstorms for undergraduate computer engineers

Does the Inclusion of Robots Affect Engineering Students’ Achievement in Computer Programming Courses?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About