2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not everything is celiac disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). The finding of the villous atrophy and increased intraepithelial lymphocytes alone does not always amount to the diagnosis of CD and hence the diagnosis of CD in our cohort children may be called into question. Various conditions other than CD have been shown to cause inflammatory cell infiltrates with or without villous atrophy of the duodenal mucosa and these include cow's milk or soy milk enteritis, post‐viral enteritis, Crohn's disease, immunodeficiency disorders, auto‐immune enteropathy, giardiasis, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory agents, Helicobacter pylori gastritis and others . However, none of our group had clinical or other histological features suggestive of these diagnoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…). The finding of the villous atrophy and increased intraepithelial lymphocytes alone does not always amount to the diagnosis of CD and hence the diagnosis of CD in our cohort children may be called into question. Various conditions other than CD have been shown to cause inflammatory cell infiltrates with or without villous atrophy of the duodenal mucosa and these include cow's milk or soy milk enteritis, post‐viral enteritis, Crohn's disease, immunodeficiency disorders, auto‐immune enteropathy, giardiasis, non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory agents, Helicobacter pylori gastritis and others . However, none of our group had clinical or other histological features suggestive of these diagnoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The diagnosis of CD in this study was based strictly on histopathologic findings, and reliance on histology alone has been criticized for its lack of specificity. 27 For this reason, we considered only the most severe histopathologic changes (Marsh III lesions) as CD, excluding the increasingly common report of increased intraepithelial lymphocytosis, so as to maximize the specificity of the outcome in this analysis. Certain providers may have a particular interest or expertise in CD, and thus are more likely to submit ≥4 specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%