2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not by growth alone: The role of the distribution of income in regional diversity in poverty reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
101
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
101
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method provides considerably more precise regional and temporal estimates of the income and inequality elasticities of poverty that often contradict earlier studies. For example, we find universally higher income elasticities in Latin America and Eastern Europe and Central Asia but lower income elasticities in both South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa than reported earlier (Kalwij and Verschoor, 2007). Furthermore, since income or inequality elasticities of poverty are concepts of relative change, they may give the misleading impression that richer countries are becoming ever better at reducing poverty even though the underlying absolute changes are small.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our method provides considerably more precise regional and temporal estimates of the income and inequality elasticities of poverty that often contradict earlier studies. For example, we find universally higher income elasticities in Latin America and Eastern Europe and Central Asia but lower income elasticities in both South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa than reported earlier (Kalwij and Verschoor, 2007). Furthermore, since income or inequality elasticities of poverty are concepts of relative change, they may give the misleading impression that richer countries are becoming ever better at reducing poverty even though the underlying absolute changes are small.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Given the salience of this issue to both policy makers and academics, an increasingly large literature analyzes the impact of changes in incomes and inequality on poverty, as well as their respective contributions towards poverty reduction in the past decades (Ravallion and Chen, 1997;Besley and Burgess, 2003;Bourguignon, 2003;Kraay, 2006;Kalwij and Verschoor, 2007;Bresson, 2009;Chambers and Dhongde, 2011). Collectively, these studies established not only that income growth is crucial to achieving sustained decreases in poverty but also that the benefits of income growth strongly depend on the initial levels of income and inequality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current paper deviates from especially the most recent comprehensive study on the subject (Kalwij and Verschoor 2007) in several respects. First, it extends the analysis to other measures beyond the headcount ratio used in that study, namely, the depth and severity of poverty measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…They include Fosu (2009Fosu ( , 2010cFosu ( , 2011 and Kalwij and Verschoor (2007). Such an approach helps control for the effects of unobservable country-specific factors that are often present in static cross-country studies.…”
Section: The Growth-inequality-poverty Nexus -A Brief Review Of the Lmentioning
confidence: 99%