2020
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2020.1743254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not all transcendence is created equal: Distinguishing ontological, phenomenological, and subjective beliefs about transcendence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical first step is developing more nuanced definitions of transcendent motivation orientations that take into account the differences between the many objects, ideas, associations, or content responsible for transcendent motivation (Callaway, Kawakami Gilbertson, & Schnitker, 2019). For example, transcendent motivation can be inspired by religious faith or political ideology; theistic or non-theistic religion; religious or spiritual beliefs; prosocial concerns or religious responsibility.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical first step is developing more nuanced definitions of transcendent motivation orientations that take into account the differences between the many objects, ideas, associations, or content responsible for transcendent motivation (Callaway, Kawakami Gilbertson, & Schnitker, 2019). For example, transcendent motivation can be inspired by religious faith or political ideology; theistic or non-theistic religion; religious or spiritual beliefs; prosocial concerns or religious responsibility.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, we examine these associations only among students who self-identify as spiritual and/or belonging to a religious group. Although some students who identify as Agnostic, Atheist, or not Spiritual or Religious may have spiritual struggles ( Exline et al, 2014 ) or other experiences of transcendence ( Callaway et al, 2020 ), it is likely that their spiritual experiences are qualitatively distinct from those who identify as spiritual and/or religious and are therefore beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than “transcendence,” some researchers (e.g., Davis et al, 2012) refer to this phenomenon as “transomatization” to make clear that the boundary being crossed has to do with the physical body rather than some metaphysical plane. For similar reasons, others prefer the language of “self-transcendence” (Raney et al, 2018) or “subjective transcendence” (Callaway et al, 2020). Regardless, the common thread uniting them all is a shared recognition that, by integrating different worlds of perceptual experience (e.g., inner/outer), intense or peak encounters with art often involve the erasure or collapsing of the boundaries between self/mind/body/world/other.…”
Section: Organizing the Research On The Psychological Effects Of Aest...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the present account seeks to address this gap in the literature by identifying a series of religious thoughts, beliefs, and intuitions that researchers have operationalized in psychological terms. These late-stage processes include: God Representations, which can be both personified and abstract (Johnson et al, 2019); Transcendent belief systems, which are defined as “the embodied cognitive activities that lead humans to code personal experience as well as the spatial layout of the cosmos” (Callaway et al, 2020, p. 480); and Non-Theistic Supernatural Beliefs (Epley et al, 2008), such as beliefs in ghosts, ancestral spirits, or other extra-human agents.…”
Section: Organizing the Research On The Psychological Effects Of Aest...mentioning
confidence: 99%