2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020jf006001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not all Icequakes are Created Equal: Basal Icequakes Suggest Diverse Bed Deformation Mechanisms at Rutford Ice Stream, West Antarctica

Abstract: Mass transfer from the ice sheet interior to the oceans is dominated by ice stream flow (Rignot et al., 2011), which, in turn, is governed by deformation within the ice, and friction and deformation at the bed, that is, the contact between ice and underlying sediments or bedrock. Furthermore, tidally induced modulations influence the flow dynamics of some ice streams, likely by introducing pressure modulation at the bed (Anandakrishnan et al., 2003; Gudmundsson, 2006). Poorly constrained processes and conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(222 reference statements)
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All P-phase polarities are correctly fitted by the geophones, as are the majority of S-phase polarities, although there is more uncertainty for the S-wave matches due to some of the shear wave splitting not being entirely compensated for. Unfortunately, geophone coverage of the focal sphere for the network configuration is not as well configured for source mechanism analysis as previous studies (Hudson et al, 2020;Kufner et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2015), leaving the most likely DC source poorly constrained compared to previous observations. While the slip vector is approximately the direction of ice flow, and therefore in agreement with the DAS source inversion, the uncertainty, denoted by the dashed lines, indicates ~270° azimuthal uncertainty.…”
Section: Source Mechanism Inversionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All P-phase polarities are correctly fitted by the geophones, as are the majority of S-phase polarities, although there is more uncertainty for the S-wave matches due to some of the shear wave splitting not being entirely compensated for. Unfortunately, geophone coverage of the focal sphere for the network configuration is not as well configured for source mechanism analysis as previous studies (Hudson et al, 2020;Kufner et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2015), leaving the most likely DC source poorly constrained compared to previous observations. While the slip vector is approximately the direction of ice flow, and therefore in agreement with the DAS source inversion, the uncertainty, denoted by the dashed lines, indicates ~270° azimuthal uncertainty.…”
Section: Source Mechanism Inversionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This effectively acts as a moving average measurement of strain over 10 m of fiber, in 1 m increments, with the maximum resolvable frequency signals for ice therefore being ~200 Hz and ~90 Hz, for P-and S-waves with velocities of 3841 m s -1 and 1970 m s -1 , respectively. These frequencies are greater than typical observed icequake corner frequencies at Rutford Ice Stream (Hudson et al, 2020;Kufner et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2015). The seismic data were acquired in January 2020, during the austral summer.…”
Section: Data and Site Locationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This effectively acts as a moving average measurement of strain over 10 m of fiber, in 1 m increments, with the maximum resolvable frequency signals for ice therefore being ∼200 and ∼90 Hz, for P-and S-waves with velocities of 3,841 and 1,970 m s −1 , respectively. These frequencies are greater than typical observed icequake corner frequencies at Rutford Ice Stream (Hudson et al, 2020;Kufner et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2015).…”
Section: Data and Site Locationmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The source inversion method is a full-waveform Bayesian source mechanism inversion, randomly sampling the model space millions of times in order to obtain an estimate of the posterior probability distribution. We constrain the source model to be a Double-Couple (DC) model, which is appropriate for the predominantly stick-slip seismicity observed at Rutford Ice Stream (Hudson et al, 2020;Kufner et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2015). The DAS source inversion workflow is as follows:…”
Section: Das Source Mechanism Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation