2015
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not All Hazards are Created Equal: The Significance of Hazards in Inattentional Blindness for Static Driving Scenes

Abstract: SummaryExplaining how we attend to some objects and not others in real world environments remains a challenge for theories of attention. Driving is an ideal example of this, as it requires a complex synthesis of attentional processing, while still allowing attention to be captured by hazards. In the current study we employed a static inattentional blindness (IB) driving task in which participants were required to make decisions about the content of driving‐related scenarios. In a critical trial, an additional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, the physical features of the animate and inanimate objects in this study were essentially identical, with the difference being how the object was contextualized (i.e., embedded in an advertisement or not). This effect of animacy was also observed across age groups and across trials and the effect is consistent with past studies involving both non-driving tasks as well as driving relevant scenes (Pammer and Blink, 2013; Calvillo and Jackson, 2014; Pammer et al, 2015; Calvillo and Hawkins, 2016; Topolšek et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Importantly, the physical features of the animate and inanimate objects in this study were essentially identical, with the difference being how the object was contextualized (i.e., embedded in an advertisement or not). This effect of animacy was also observed across age groups and across trials and the effect is consistent with past studies involving both non-driving tasks as well as driving relevant scenes (Pammer and Blink, 2013; Calvillo and Jackson, 2014; Pammer et al, 2015; Calvillo and Hawkins, 2016; Topolšek et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition to the effects of the context, task, and load on inattentional blindness, the relevance of the unexpected object to the primary task itself may also be a contributing factor. In inattentional blindness studies, the target object of interest is often referred to as “irrelevant” to the main task or “unexpected.” The same may not be true in contextualized tasks such as driving where the environmental features and objects can differ and vary dynamically in terms of their relevance (e.g., proximity to roadway, or ability to interfere with the primary driving task) (Pammer and Blink, 2013; Pammer et al, 2015; Topolšek et al, 2016; Murphy and Greene, 2017a). Animacy is a characteristic that is particularly relevant in the context of driving given that it introduces the increased probability that the object could interfere/interact with the driving task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have examined the detection of objects that were relevant to how people performed the primary task but that were still unexpected (Pammer, Bairnsfather, Burns, & Hellsing, 2015 ). When asked to judge whether briefly presented photographs depicted safe or unsafe driving scenes, many people failed to notice pedestrians positioned unexpectedly near the road, and they were somewhat more likely to notice pedestrians who constituted more of a hazard.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inattentional blindness in cognitively-demanding situations can result in serious consequences, such as surgeons not seeing misplaced surgical instruments (Hughes-Hallett et al, 2015), radiologists not noticing unusual spots in a lung cancer screening scan AN EXAMINATION OF INATTENTIONAL BLINDNESS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT 3 (Drew et al, 2013), or security guards failing to see an unusual or suspicious individual on a security video feed (Nasholm et al, 2014). Inattentional blindness can result in distracted drivers not seeing a child about to enter traffic (Pammer et al, 2015), or an athlete not seeing an open teammate during a big game (Memmert & Furley, 2007).…”
Section: Inattentional Blindnessmentioning
confidence: 99%