2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5355-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not all drugs are created equal: impaired future thinking in opiate, but not alcohol, users

Abstract: Episodic future thinking refers to the ability to travel forward in time to pre-experience an event. Although future thinking has been intimately linked with self and identity, to our knowledge, no prior research has compared episodic future thinking in populations with different substance use disorders. This study investigates whether there are differences in episodic future thinking between these alcohol and opiate users. The study recruited participants who were on the opiate substitution program (n = 31) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural evidence demonstrates that future thinking activates frontal cortices (Benoit & Schacter, 2015; Okuda et al, 2003) associated with the executive-decision system, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Moreover, impaired episodic future thinking is associated with poor executive function (de Vito et al, 2012), opioid use (Moustafa et al, 2018), and high rates of delay discounting (Bromberg, Wiehler, & Peters, 2015).…”
Section: Neuroeconomics-based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural evidence demonstrates that future thinking activates frontal cortices (Benoit & Schacter, 2015; Okuda et al, 2003) associated with the executive-decision system, including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Moreover, impaired episodic future thinking is associated with poor executive function (de Vito et al, 2012), opioid use (Moustafa et al, 2018), and high rates of delay discounting (Bromberg, Wiehler, & Peters, 2015).…”
Section: Neuroeconomics-based Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Moustafa et al, 2018a;Moustafa et al, 2018b). In other words, individuals who think more about the future may abide by security rules to make sure their computer system is safe in the future.…”
Section: Individual Differences Underlying Cyber Security Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 illustrates the conceptual process of the proposed framework and the implications of each stage of this approach in real-life settings. CIREF benefits from EFT enhancement as a translatable approach in clinical settings (68) that is also necessitated by pieces of evidence showing that individuals with addictive behaviors have difficulties imagining future events and implementing intentions based on them (69)(70)(71)(72). Moreover, the suggested framework could fill in the gaps of CET and memory reconsolidation interventions by taking a step further from classical conditioning and updating past drug-related memories by implementing goal-based strategies.…”
Section: ) Predicting Response To Cue Exposure and Its Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%